APO
Price
$137.16
Change
-$7.73 (-5.34%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
78.46B
34 days until earnings call
CG
Price
$64.00
Change
-$3.20 (-4.76%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
23.15B
47 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

APO vs CG

Header iconAPO vs CG Comparison
Open Charts APO vs CGBanner chart's image
Apollo Global Management
Price$137.16
Change-$7.73 (-5.34%)
Volume$3.27M
Capitalization78.46B
Carlyle Group (The)
Price$64.00
Change-$3.20 (-4.76%)
Volume$2.49M
Capitalization23.15B
APO vs CG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
APO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APO vs. CG commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APO is a Buy and CG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (APO: $137.16 vs. CG: $64.00)
Brand notoriety: APO and CG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APO: 100% vs. CG: 92%
Market capitalization -- APO: $78.46B vs. CG: $23.15B
APO [@Investment Managers] is valued at $78.46B. CG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $23.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $174.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APO’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • APO’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, APO is a better buy in the long-term than CG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CG’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • CG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, APO is a better buy in the short-term than CG.

Price Growth

APO (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.20% price change this week, while CG (@Investment Managers) price change was -5.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

APO is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

CG is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.82% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APO($78.5B) has a higher market cap than CG($23.1B). APO has higher P/E ratio than CG: APO (25.59) vs CG (18.71). CG YTD gains are higher at: 29.274 vs. APO (-16.114). CG has less debt than APO: CG (10.7B) vs APO (12.1B). APO has higher revenues than CG: APO (25.4B) vs CG (3.71B).
APOCGAPO / CG
Capitalization78.5B23.1B340%
EBITDA7.39BN/A-
Gain YTD-16.11429.274-55%
P/E Ratio25.5918.71137%
Revenue25.4B3.71B685%
Total Cash231BN/A-
Total Debt12.1B10.7B113%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APO vs CG: Fundamental Ratings
APO
CG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
57
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3334
SMR RATING
1..100
6030
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5040
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

APO's Valuation (27) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CG (27). This means that APO’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

APO's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CG (34). This means that APO’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

CG's SMR Rating (30) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as APO (60). This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to APO’s over the last 12 months.

CG's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as APO (50). This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to APO’s over the last 12 months.

APO's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for CG (100). This means that APO’s stock grew significantly faster than CG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APOCG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
REMX65.113.95
+6.46%
VanEck Rare Earth & Strat Mtls ETF
QPFF35.70N/A
N/A
American Century Quality Preferred ETF
ABXB19.90-0.02
-0.12%
Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF
IWF465.22-2.52
-0.54%
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
PICB23.82-0.14
-0.56%
Invesco International Corporate Bond ETF

APO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APO has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APO jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APO
1D Price
Change %
APO100%
-5.34%
KKR - APO
86%
Closely correlated
-6.32%
OWL - APO
84%
Closely correlated
-7.24%
CG - APO
81%
Closely correlated
-4.76%
ARES - APO
81%
Closely correlated
-7.13%
TPG - APO
80%
Closely correlated
-6.00%
More

CG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CG has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CG jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CG
1D Price
Change %
CG100%
-4.76%
KKR - CG
88%
Closely correlated
-6.32%
TPG - CG
86%
Closely correlated
-6.00%
ARES - CG
84%
Closely correlated
-7.13%
OWL - CG
84%
Closely correlated
-7.24%
BX - CG
84%
Closely correlated
-3.69%
More