APO
Price
$144.15
Change
+$0.09 (+0.06%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
83.67B
24 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CEVIY
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
2.31B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

APO vs CEVIY

Header iconAPO vs CEVIY Comparison
Open Charts APO vs CEVIYBanner chart's image
Apollo Global Management
Price$144.15
Change+$0.09 (+0.06%)
Volume$2.05M
Capitalization83.67B
China Everbright IHD Pacific
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$201
Capitalization2.31B
APO vs CEVIY Comparison Chart in %
APO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CEVIY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APO vs. CEVIY commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APO is a Hold and CEVIY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (APO: $144.06 vs. CEVIY: $5.15)
Brand notoriety: APO and CEVIY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APO: 76% vs. CEVIY: 100%
Market capitalization -- APO: $83.67B vs. CEVIY: $2.27B
APO [@Investment Managers] is valued at $83.67B. CEVIY’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $2.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCEVIY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • APO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CEVIY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, APO is a better buy in the long-term than CEVIY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CEVIY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CEVIY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CEVIY is a better buy in the short-term than APO.

Price Growth

APO (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.15% price change this week, while CEVIY (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

APO is expected to report earnings on Feb 09, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.83% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APO($83.7B) has a higher market cap than CEVIY($2.31B). CEVIY YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. APO (-0.484). APO has higher revenues than CEVIY: APO (27.5B) vs CEVIY (1.4B).
APOCEVIYAPO / CEVIY
Capitalization83.7B2.31B3,628%
EBITDA8.33BN/A-
Gain YTD-0.4840.000-
P/E Ratio21.01N/A-
Revenue27.5B1.4B1,964%
Total Cash246BN/A-
Total Debt12.6BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APO vs CEVIY: Fundamental Ratings
APO
CEVIY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6642
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
34100
SMR RATING
1..100
5398
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5873
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2648
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CEVIY's Valuation (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APO (82) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that CEVIY’s stock grew somewhat faster than APO’s over the last 12 months.

APO's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for CEVIY (100) in the null industry. This means that APO’s stock grew significantly faster than CEVIY’s over the last 12 months.

APO's SMR Rating (53) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CEVIY (98) in the null industry. This means that APO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CEVIY’s over the last 12 months.

APO's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CEVIY (73) in the null industry. This means that APO’s stock grew similarly to CEVIY’s over the last 12 months.

APO's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CEVIY (48) in the null industry. This means that APO’s stock grew similarly to CEVIY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APOCEVIY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
73%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CEVIY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GOEX90.420.53
+0.59%
Global X Gold Explorers ETF
NERD24.420.04
+0.16%
Roundhill Video Games ETF
HEZU45.57-0.02
-0.04%
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozn ETF
DUHP38.47-0.12
-0.31%
Dimensional US High Profitability ETF
QMAG23.74-0.09
-0.39%
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Mod Buffr ETF - Aug

CEVIY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CEVIY and CYMBF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CEVIY and CYMBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CEVIY
1D Price
Change %
CEVIY100%
N/A
CYMBF - CEVIY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSWC - CEVIY
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.18%
BCSF - CEVIY
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
APO - CEVIY
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
MGLD - CEVIY
1%
Poorly correlated
-6.06%
More