APO
Price
$121.38
Change
+$0.54 (+0.45%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
69.43B
16 days until earnings call
CEVIY
Price
$5.40
Change
-$0.13 (-2.35%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
2.23B
Interact to see
Advertisement

APO vs CEVIY

Header iconAPO vs CEVIY Comparison
Open Charts APO vs CEVIYBanner chart's image
Apollo Global Management
Price$121.38
Change+$0.54 (+0.45%)
Volume$3.35M
Capitalization69.43B
China Everbright IHD Pacific
Price$5.40
Change-$0.13 (-2.35%)
Volume$201
Capitalization2.23B
APO vs CEVIY Comparison Chart in %
APO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CEVIY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APO vs. CEVIY commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APO is a Hold and CEVIY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (APO: $121.38 vs. CEVIY: $5.15)
Brand notoriety: APO and CEVIY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APO: 94% vs. CEVIY: 100%
Market capitalization -- APO: $69.43B vs. CEVIY: $2.23B
APO [@Investment Managers] is valued at $69.43B. CEVIY’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $2.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $180.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCEVIY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • APO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CEVIY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, APO is a better buy in the long-term than CEVIY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CEVIY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • CEVIY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both APO and CEVIY are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

APO (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.67% price change this week, while CEVIY (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

APO is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.22% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APO($69.4B) has a higher market cap than CEVIY($2.24B). CEVIY YTD gains are higher at: 29.153 vs. APO (-25.765). APO has higher revenues than CEVIY: APO (25.4B) vs CEVIY (1.4B).
APOCEVIYAPO / CEVIY
Capitalization69.4B2.24B3,105%
EBITDA7.39BN/A-
Gain YTD-25.76529.153-88%
P/E Ratio22.65N/A-
Revenue25.4B1.4B1,814%
Total Cash231BN/A-
Total Debt12.1BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APO vs CEVIY: Fundamental Ratings
APO
CEVIY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8150
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
38100
SMR RATING
1..100
6098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8358
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1544
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CEVIY's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as APO (26) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that CEVIY’s stock grew similarly to APO’s over the last 12 months.

APO's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CEVIY (100) in the null industry. This means that APO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CEVIY’s over the last 12 months.

APO's SMR Rating (60) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CEVIY (98) in the null industry. This means that APO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CEVIY’s over the last 12 months.

CEVIY's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as APO (83) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that CEVIY’s stock grew similarly to APO’s over the last 12 months.

APO's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CEVIY (44) in the null industry. This means that APO’s stock grew similarly to CEVIY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APOCEVIY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
8%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
10%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
12%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
64%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CEVIY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VDC217.492.69
+1.25%
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
SDTY45.020.22
+0.50%
YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Cov Cll Stgy ETF
BMAY43.780.17
+0.40%
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™- May
FIIG21.450.02
+0.09%
First Trust Intermediate DurInvGrdCrpETF
NBDS36.49N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF

APO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APO has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APO jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APO
1D Price
Change %
APO100%
+0.45%
KKR - APO
87%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
OWL - APO
86%
Closely correlated
+1.83%
ARES - APO
82%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
CG - APO
81%
Closely correlated
+0.26%
TPG - APO
81%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
More

CEVIY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CEVIY and CYMBF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CEVIY and CYMBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CEVIY
1D Price
Change %
CEVIY100%
N/A
CYMBF - CEVIY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSWC - CEVIY
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
BCSF - CEVIY
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.68%
APO - CEVIY
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
MGLD - CEVIY
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
More