APO
Price
$134.54
Change
+$0.05 (+0.04%)
Updated
Jan 30 closing price
Capitalization
78.09B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BN
Price
$45.55
Change
-$1.00 (-2.15%)
Updated
Jan 30 closing price
Capitalization
103.25B
11 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

APO vs BN

Header iconAPO vs BN Comparison
Open Charts APO vs BNBanner chart's image
Apollo Global Management
Price$134.54
Change+$0.05 (+0.04%)
Volume$2.35M
Capitalization78.09B
Brookfield
Price$45.55
Change-$1.00 (-2.15%)
Volume$5.61M
Capitalization103.25B
APO vs BN Comparison Chart in %
APO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APO vs. BN commentary
Feb 01, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APO is a StrongBuy and BN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 01, 2026
Stock price -- (APO: $134.54 vs. BN: $45.55)
Brand notoriety: APO and BN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APO: 81% vs. BN: 141%
Market capitalization -- APO: $78.09B vs. BN: $103.25B
APO [@Investment Managers] is valued at $78.09B. BN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $103.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $173.55B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • APO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, APO is a better buy in the long-term than BN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, APO is a better buy in the short-term than BN.

Price Growth

APO (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.30% price change this week, while BN (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

APO is expected to report earnings on Feb 09, 2026.

BN is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.19% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BN($103B) has a higher market cap than APO($78.1B). BN has higher P/E ratio than APO: BN (127.71) vs APO (19.61). BN YTD gains are higher at: -0.741 vs. APO (-7.060). BN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 29.7B vs. APO (8.33B). APO has less debt than BN: APO (12.6B) vs BN (259B). BN has higher revenues than APO: BN (74.4B) vs APO (27.5B).
APOBNAPO / BN
Capitalization78.1B103B76%
EBITDA8.33B29.7B28%
Gain YTD-7.060-0.741953%
P/E Ratio19.61127.7115%
Revenue27.5B74.4B37%
Total Cash246BN/A-
Total Debt12.6B259B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APO vs BN: Fundamental Ratings
APO
BN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
580
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3925
SMR RATING
1..100
5388
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6154
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4057
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

APO's Valuation (82) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (91). This means that APO’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as APO (39). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to APO’s over the last 12 months.

APO's SMR Rating (53) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BN (88). This means that APO’s stock grew somewhat faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as APO (61). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to APO’s over the last 12 months.

APO's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (57). This means that APO’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APOBN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TAXE51.460.03
+0.06%
T. Rowe Price Intermediate Muncpl IncETF
ZALT32.820.01
+0.03%
Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffr ETF - Qt
PYLD26.85-0.02
-0.07%
PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF
PBAP29.12-0.02
-0.08%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - Apr
HYI11.14-0.03
-0.27%
Western Asset High Yield Opportunity Fund Inc

APO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APO has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APO jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APO
1D Price
Change %
APO100%
+0.04%
KKR - APO
85%
Closely correlated
-0.63%
ARES - APO
81%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
OWL - APO
81%
Closely correlated
-2.50%
BX - APO
80%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
CG - APO
79%
Closely correlated
-1.21%
More

BN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BN
1D Price
Change %
BN100%
-2.15%
BAM - BN
86%
Closely correlated
-1.93%
KKR - BN
81%
Closely correlated
-0.63%
BX - BN
80%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
CG - BN
79%
Closely correlated
-1.21%
APO - BN
78%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
More