APO
Price
$131.54
Change
-$3.22 (-2.39%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
75.25B
53 days until earnings call
BN
Price
$66.55
Change
-$0.02 (-0.03%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
99.94B
68 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

APO vs BN

Header iconAPO vs BN Comparison
Open Charts APO vs BNBanner chart's image
Apollo Global Management
Price$131.54
Change-$3.22 (-2.39%)
Volume$13.45K
Capitalization75.25B
Brookfield
Price$66.55
Change-$0.02 (-0.03%)
Volume$13.77K
Capitalization99.94B
APO vs BN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
APO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APO vs. BN commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APO is a Hold and BN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (APO: $134.76 vs. BN: $66.56)
Brand notoriety: APO and BN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APO: 98% vs. BN: 81%
Market capitalization -- APO: $75.25B vs. BN: $99.94B
APO [@Investment Managers] is valued at $75.25B. BN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $99.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBN’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • APO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, BN is a better buy in the long-term than APO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BN is a better buy in the short-term than APO.

Price Growth

APO (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.20% price change this week, while BN (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +39.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

APO is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

BN is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.53% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BN($99.9B) has a higher market cap than APO($75.3B). BN has higher P/E ratio than APO: BN (151.16) vs APO (24.54). BN YTD gains are higher at: 16.249 vs. APO (-17.582). APO has less debt than BN: APO (10.6B) vs BN (251B).
APOBNAPO / BN
Capitalization75.3B99.9B75%
EBITDAN/A30.3B-
Gain YTD-17.58216.249-108%
P/E Ratio24.54151.1616%
RevenueN/A76.1B-
Total CashN/A22.9B-
Total Debt10.6B251B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APO vs BN: Fundamental Ratings
APO
BN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7165
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3521
SMR RATING
1..100
5491
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5747
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
811
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

APO's Valuation (27) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (33). This means that APO’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as APO (35). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to APO’s over the last 12 months.

APO's SMR Rating (54) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BN (91). This means that APO’s stock grew somewhat faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as APO (57). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to APO’s over the last 12 months.

APO's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (11). This means that APO’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APOBN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NRK9.510.06
+0.63%
Nuveen New York AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund
KJUN27.020.14
+0.52%
Innovator U.S. Small Cp Pwr Buf ETF -Jun
BKUI49.780.03
+0.05%
BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF
DRIP8.78-0.19
-2.12%
Direxion Dly S&P Oil&Gs Ex&Prd Br 2X ETF
RSR.X0.007240-0.000422
-5.50%
Reserve Rights cryptocurrency

APO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APO has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APO jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APO
1D Price
Change %
APO100%
+1.61%
KKR - APO
86%
Closely correlated
+1.87%
OWL - APO
84%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
ARES - APO
82%
Closely correlated
+1.83%
CG - APO
82%
Closely correlated
+2.45%
TPG - APO
80%
Closely correlated
+1.53%
More

BN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BN
1D Price
Change %
BN100%
+1.87%
BAM - BN
84%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
KKR - BN
81%
Closely correlated
+1.87%
JHG - BN
81%
Closely correlated
+2.48%
BX - BN
81%
Closely correlated
+1.53%
APO - BN
80%
Closely correlated
+1.61%
More