APO
Price
$126.85
Change
+$3.31 (+2.68%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
73.63B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BAM
Price
$47.37
Change
-$11.40 (-19.40%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
76.08B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

APO vs BAM

Header iconAPO vs BAM Comparison
Open Charts APO vs BAMBanner chart's image
Apollo Global Management
Price$126.85
Change+$3.31 (+2.68%)
Volume$9.42M
Capitalization73.63B
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$47.37
Change-$11.40 (-19.40%)
Volume$6.01M
Capitalization76.08B
APO vs BAM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APO vs. BAM commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APO is a StrongBuy and BAM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (APO: $126.85 vs. BAM: $47.37)
Brand notoriety: APO and BAM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APO: 305% vs. BAM: 258%
Market capitalization -- APO: $73.63B vs. BAM: $76.08B
APO [@Investment Managers] is valued at $73.63B. BAM’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $76.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $165.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBAM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • APO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, APO is a better buy in the long-term than BAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BAM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, APO is a better buy in the short-term than BAM.

Price Growth

APO (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.70% price change this week, while BAM (@Investment Managers) price change was -8.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

APO is expected to report earnings on Feb 09, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.42% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAM($76.1B) and APO($73.6B) have the same market capitalization . BAM has higher P/E ratio than APO: BAM (30.56) vs APO (18.49). BAM YTD gains are higher at: -9.582 vs. APO (-12.372). APO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.33B vs. BAM (1.07B). APO has more cash in the bank: 246B vs. BAM (1.06B). BAM has less debt than APO: BAM (2.8B) vs APO (12.6B). APO has higher revenues than BAM: APO (27.5B) vs BAM (913M).
APOBAMAPO / BAM
Capitalization73.6B76.1B97%
EBITDA8.33B1.07B779%
Gain YTD-12.372-9.582129%
P/E Ratio18.4930.5661%
Revenue27.5B913M3,012%
Total Cash246B1.06B23,164%
Total Debt12.6B2.8B450%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APO vs BAM: Fundamental Ratings
APO
BAM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
358
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4177
SMR RATING
1..100
5350
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6377
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4591
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAM's Valuation (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APO (79) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than APO’s over the last 12 months.

APO's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAM (77) in the null industry. This means that APO’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as APO (53) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to APO’s over the last 12 months.

APO's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (77) in the null industry. This means that APO’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

APO's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAM (91) in the null industry. This means that APO’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APOBAM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HWAY34.330.64
+1.90%
Themes US Infrastructure ETF
PSFM32.060.05
+0.16%
Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF
DFCA50.460.01
+0.03%
Dimensional California Municipal Bd ETF
AESR17.56-0.10
-0.57%
Anfield US Equity Sector Rotation ETF
QLD70.46-2.27
-3.12%
ProShares Ultra QQQ

APO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APO has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APO jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APO
1D Price
Change %
APO100%
-4.76%
KKR - APO
85%
Closely correlated
-9.69%
OWL - APO
85%
Closely correlated
-9.76%
ARES - APO
81%
Closely correlated
-10.15%
TPG - APO
80%
Closely correlated
-8.38%
BX - APO
80%
Closely correlated
-5.24%
More

BAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAM
1D Price
Change %
BAM100%
-6.68%
BN - BAM
86%
Closely correlated
-4.21%
CG - BAM
76%
Closely correlated
-3.46%
KKR - BAM
76%
Closely correlated
-9.69%
BX - BAM
75%
Closely correlated
-5.24%
APO - BAM
74%
Closely correlated
-4.76%
More