APO
Price
$126.78
Change
+$1.57 (+1.25%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
63.9B
13 days until earnings call
BAM
Price
$48.59
Change
+$0.60 (+1.25%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
16.34B
Ad is loading...

APO vs BAM

Header iconAPO vs BAM Comparison
Open Charts APO vs BAMBanner chart's image
Apollo Global Management
Price$126.78
Change+$1.57 (+1.25%)
Volume$2.64M
Capitalization63.9B
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$48.59
Change+$0.60 (+1.25%)
Volume$1.22M
Capitalization16.34B
APO vs BAM Comparison Chart
Loading...
APO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APO vs. BAM commentary
Apr 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APO is a Hold and BAM is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 20, 2025
Stock price -- (APO: $126.78 vs. BAM: $48.59)
Brand notoriety: APO and BAM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APO: 56% vs. BAM: 55%
Market capitalization -- APO: $63.9B vs. BAM: $16.34B
APO [@Investment Managers] is valued at $63.9B. BAM’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $16.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APO’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileBAM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • APO’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • BAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both APO and BAM are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BAM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BAM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the short-term than APO.

Price Growth

APO (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.30% price change this week, while BAM (@Investment Managers) price change was +5.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

APO is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

BAM is expected to report earnings on Feb 08, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.90% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APO($63.9B) has a higher market cap than BAM($16.3B). BAM has higher P/E ratio than APO: BAM (37.12) vs APO (13.58). BAM YTD gains are higher at: -9.631 vs. APO (-23.019). APO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.65B vs. BAM (522M). APO has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. BAM (9M). BAM has less debt than APO: BAM (256M) vs APO (8.09B). APO has higher revenues than BAM: APO (32.6B) vs BAM (383M).
APOBAMAPO / BAM
Capitalization63.9B16.3B392%
EBITDA6.65B522M1,273%
Gain YTD-23.019-9.631239%
P/E Ratio13.5837.1237%
Revenue32.6B383M8,512%
Total Cash170B9M1,888,889%
Total Debt8.09B256M3,161%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APO vs BAM: Fundamental Ratings
APO
BAM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
916
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2446
SMR RATING
1..100
4145
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6052
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1735
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
46n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAM's Valuation (27) in the null industry is in the same range as APO (33) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to APO’s over the last 12 months.

APO's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (46) in the null industry. This means that APO’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

APO's SMR Rating (41) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (45) in the null industry. This means that APO’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as APO (60) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to APO’s over the last 12 months.

APO's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (35) in the null industry. This means that APO’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APOBAM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
72%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
APO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.780.53
+2.02%
GameStop Corp
AAPL196.982.71
+1.39%
Apple
SPY526.410.75
+0.14%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA241.37-0.18
-0.07%
Tesla
BTC.X84450.805000-444.945300
-0.52%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

APO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APO has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APO jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APO
1D Price
Change %
APO100%
+1.25%
ARES - APO
83%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
OWL - APO
81%
Closely correlated
+1.81%
KKR - APO
81%
Closely correlated
+1.29%
TPG - APO
79%
Closely correlated
N/A
CG - APO
78%
Closely correlated
+1.67%
More

BAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAM
1D Price
Change %
BAM100%
+1.25%
BN - BAM
85%
Closely correlated
+1.78%
BX - BAM
79%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
CG - BAM
75%
Closely correlated
+1.67%
ARES - BAM
73%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
APO - BAM
73%
Closely correlated
+1.25%
More