It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APNHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePBH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PBH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
APNHF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PBH (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was +3.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +56.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.95%.
PBH is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.
Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
APNHF | PBH | APNHF / PBH | |
Capitalization | 4.83B | 3.6B | 134% |
EBITDA | 7.98B | 10.8M | 73,843% |
Gain YTD | 33.026 | 34.466 | 96% |
P/E Ratio | 12.52 | 14.90 | 84% |
Revenue | 38.4B | 1.13B | 3,386% |
Total Cash | 8.05B | 63.6M | 12,649% |
Total Debt | 26.8B | 1.21B | 2,208% |
APNHF | PBH | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 40 | 28 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 22 Undervalued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | 40 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 35 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
APNHF's Valuation (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PBH (88) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that APNHF’s stock grew significantly faster than PBH’s over the last 12 months.
PBH's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APNHF (50) in the null industry. This means that PBH’s stock grew somewhat faster than APNHF’s over the last 12 months.
PBH's SMR Rating (91) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is in the same range as APNHF (98) in the null industry. This means that PBH’s stock grew similarly to APNHF’s over the last 12 months.
PBH's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is in the same range as APNHF (47) in the null industry. This means that PBH’s stock grew similarly to APNHF’s over the last 12 months.
APNHF's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is in the same range as PBH (40) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that APNHF’s stock grew similarly to PBH’s over the last 12 months.
PBH | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago50% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago57% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago65% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago58% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago59% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago67% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago54% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APNHF has been closely correlated with BGM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APNHF jumps, then BGM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To APNHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
APNHF | 100% | N/A | ||
BGM - APNHF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.31% | ||
MSTH - APNHF | 34% Loosely correlated | -50.00% | ||
PBH - APNHF | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.85% | ||
YCBD - APNHF | 1% Poorly correlated | -9.04% | ||
ABSCF - APNHF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBH has been loosely correlated with PAHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PBH jumps, then PAHC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PBH | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PBH | 100% | +0.85% | ||
PAHC - PBH | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.84% | ||
SUPN - PBH | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
VTRS - PBH | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.54% | ||
ALKS - PBH | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.03% | ||
APNHF - PBH | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |