APMSF
Price
$30.50
Change
+$4.16 (+15.79%)
Updated
Feb 14 closing price
Capitalization
2.2B
BLSFF
Price
$15.06
Change
+$0.56 (+3.86%)
Updated
Jun 2 closing price
Capitalization
6.95B
Interact to see
Advertisement

APMSF vs BLSFF

Header iconAPMSF vs BLSFF Comparison
Open Charts APMSF vs BLSFFBanner chart's image
Aperam S.A
Price$30.50
Change+$4.16 (+15.79%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.2B
Bluescope Steel
Price$15.06
Change+$0.56 (+3.86%)
Volume$716
Capitalization6.95B
APMSF vs BLSFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BLSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APMSF vs. BLSFF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APMSF is a Hold and BLSFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (APMSF: $30.50 vs. BLSFF: $15.06)
Brand notoriety: APMSF and BLSFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APMSF: 100% vs. BLSFF: 40%
Market capitalization -- APMSF: $2.2B vs. BLSFF: $6.95B
APMSF [@Steel] is valued at $2.2B. BLSFF’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $6.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $31.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $5.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APMSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBLSFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • APMSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BLSFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLSFF is a better buy in the long-term than APMSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLSFF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BLSFF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

APMSF (@Steel) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BLSFF (@Steel) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +2.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (+2.05% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLSFF($6.95B) has a higher market cap than APMSF($2.21B). BLSFF has higher P/E ratio than APMSF: BLSFF (18.81) vs APMSF (8.55). BLSFF YTD gains are higher at: 25.550 vs. APMSF (15.793). BLSFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.62B vs. APMSF (349M). BLSFF has higher revenues than APMSF: BLSFF (16.4B) vs APMSF (6.26B).
APMSFBLSFFAPMSF / BLSFF
Capitalization2.21B6.95B32%
EBITDA349M1.62B22%
Gain YTD15.79325.55062%
P/E Ratio8.5518.8145%
Revenue6.26B16.4B38%
Total Cash185MN/A-
Total Debt1.42BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APMSF vs BLSFF: Fundamental Ratings
APMSF
BLSFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6640
SMR RATING
1..100
6189
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5346
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10012
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

APMSF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is in the same range as BLSFF (10). This means that APMSF’s stock grew similarly to BLSFF’s over the last 12 months.

BLSFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as APMSF (66). This means that BLSFF’s stock grew similarly to APMSF’s over the last 12 months.

APMSF's SMR Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as BLSFF (89). This means that APMSF’s stock grew similarly to BLSFF’s over the last 12 months.

BLSFF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as APMSF (53). This means that BLSFF’s stock grew similarly to APMSF’s over the last 12 months.

BLSFF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for APMSF (100). This means that BLSFF’s stock grew significantly faster than APMSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APMSFBLSFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KORU83.702.23
+2.74%
Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X ETF
AVMA62.100.20
+0.32%
Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF
SPSB30.04-0.02
-0.07%
SPDR® Portfolio Short Term Corp Bd ETF
AGZ109.08-0.12
-0.11%
iShares Agency Bond ETF
ORR29.28-0.06
-0.20%
Militia Long/Short Equity ETF

APMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APMSF has been loosely correlated with VLPNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if APMSF jumps, then VLPNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APMSF
1D Price
Change %
APMSF100%
N/A
VLPNF - APMSF
55%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AMSYF - APMSF
55%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BLSFF - APMSF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VLOWY - APMSF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
WEBC - APMSF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.16%
More

BLSFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLSFF has been loosely correlated with AMSYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLSFF jumps, then AMSYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLSFF
1D Price
Change %
BLSFF100%
N/A
AMSYF - BLSFF
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
APMSF - BLSFF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLSFY - BLSFF
17%
Poorly correlated
+7.40%
ERELY - BLSFF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARCXF - BLSFF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More