Advertisement
APLS vs BPMC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APLS is a Hold and BPMC is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APLS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBPMC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- APLS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- BPMC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APLS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BPMC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- APLS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- BPMC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
APLS (@Biotechnology) experienced а -0.76% price change this week, while BPMC (@Biotechnology) price change was +0.16% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +6.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.11%.
Reported Earning Dates
APLS is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.
BPMC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Biotechnology (+6.30% weekly)Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.
| APLS | BPMC | APLS / BPMC | |
| Capitalization | 2.3B | 8.29B | 28% |
| EBITDA | -176.08M | -66.42M | 265% |
| Gain YTD | -42.777 | 47.157 | -91% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 776M | 562M | 138% |
| Total Cash | 358M | 576M | 62% |
| Total Debt | 470M | 467M | 101% |
APLS | BPMC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 70 Overvalued | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 54 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 66 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
APLS's Valuation (70) in the Medical Distributors industry is in the same range as BPMC (81) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that APLS’s stock grew similarly to BPMC’s over the last 12 months.
BPMC's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APLS (100) in the Medical Distributors industry. This means that BPMC’s stock grew somewhat faster than APLS’s over the last 12 months.
BPMC's SMR Rating (97) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as APLS (98) in the Medical Distributors industry. This means that BPMC’s stock grew similarly to APLS’s over the last 12 months.
BPMC's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APLS (86) in the Medical Distributors industry. This means that BPMC’s stock grew somewhat faster than APLS’s over the last 12 months.
BPMC's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APLS (100) in the Medical Distributors industry. This means that BPMC’s stock grew somewhat faster than APLS’s over the last 12 months.
| APLS | BPMC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 27 days ago 81% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 79% | 10 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 65% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BLOK | 59.11 | 0.16 | +0.27% |
| Amplify Transformational Data Shrg ETF | |||
| FPXE | 30.94 | 0.07 | +0.24% |
| First Trust IPOX Europe Equity Opps ETF | |||
| NCZ | 12.85 | 0.02 | +0.16% |
| Virtus Convertible & Income Fund II | |||
| GPRF | 50.53 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs Acs US Pref Stk &HySecETF | |||
| MSTI | 20.59 | -0.03 | -0.17% |
| Madison Short-Term Strategic Income ETF | |||
APLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APLS has been loosely correlated with ROIV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if APLS jumps, then ROIV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To APLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| APLS | 100% | +2.47% | ||
| ROIV - APLS | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| BPMC - APLS | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| ARWR - APLS | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| EYPT - APLS | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| DNLI - APLS | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.41% | ||
More | ||||
BPMC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPMC has been loosely correlated with KYMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPMC jumps, then KYMR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BPMC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BPMC | 100% | +0.12% | ||
| KYMR - BPMC | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| VERA - BPMC | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.48% | ||
| NRIX - BPMC | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.33% | ||
| APLS - BPMC | 44% Loosely correlated | +2.47% | ||
| IDYA - BPMC | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.82% | ||
More | ||||