APLO
Price
$39.29
Change
-$1.39 (-3.42%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
19.23M
FRAF
Price
$42.58
Change
-$0.25 (-0.58%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
113.45M
Interact to see
Advertisement

APLO vs FRAF

Header iconAPLO vs FRAF Comparison
Open Charts APLO vs FRAFBanner chart's image
Apollo Ban
Price$39.29
Change-$1.39 (-3.42%)
Volume$200
Capitalization19.23M
Franklin Financial Services
Price$42.58
Change-$0.25 (-0.58%)
Volume$23.02K
Capitalization113.45M
APLO vs FRAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
APLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APLO vs. FRAF commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APLO is a Hold and FRAF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (APLO: $39.29 vs. FRAF: $42.58)
Brand notoriety: APLO and FRAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APLO: 130% vs. FRAF: 61%
Market capitalization -- APLO: $19.23M vs. FRAF: $113.45M
APLO [@Regional Banks] is valued at $19.23M. FRAF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $113.45M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APLO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFRAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • APLO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FRAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRAF is a better buy in the long-term than APLO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APLO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRAF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APLO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FRAF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRAF is a better buy in the short-term than APLO.

Price Growth

APLO (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FRAF (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRAF($113M) has a higher market cap than APLO($19.2M). FRAF YTD gains are higher at: 44.895 vs. APLO (18.919).
APLOFRAFAPLO / FRAF
Capitalization19.2M113M17%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD18.91944.89542%
P/E RatioN/A8.33-
RevenueN/A67.3M-
Total CashN/A20.1M-
Total DebtN/A154M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APLO vs FRAF: Fundamental Ratings
APLO
FRAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
507
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8818
SMR RATING
1..100
6746
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5541
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7422
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

APLO's Valuation (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRAF (65) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that APLO’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for APLO (88) in the null industry. This means that FRAF’s stock grew significantly faster than APLO’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's SMR Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as APLO (67) in the null industry. This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to APLO’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as APLO (55) in the null industry. This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to APLO’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APLO (74) in the null industry. This means that FRAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than APLO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APLOFRAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WXXWY7.970.37
+4.87%
Wuxi Biologics (Cayman) Inc
KMFI0.03N/A
N/A
Keller Manufacturing Company, Inc. (The)
GEBHY3.70N/A
N/A
Genting Berhad
WPNDF0.14N/A
N/A
Wishpond Technologies Ltd.
AUHYF1.42N/A
N/A
Anadolu Hayat Sigort As

APLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APLO has been loosely correlated with FSGB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if APLO jumps, then FSGB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APLO
1D Price
Change %
APLO100%
N/A
FSGB - APLO
51%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FRAF - APLO
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
MYFW - APLO
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.70%

FRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRAF has been loosely correlated with FUNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRAF jumps, then FUNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRAF
1D Price
Change %
FRAF100%
-0.82%
FUNC - FRAF
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.59%
MRBK - FRAF
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
WNEB - FRAF
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
FCCO - FRAF
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
HOMB - FRAF
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
More