It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APLD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLSK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APLD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
APLD (@Information Technology Services) experienced а +8.39% price change this week, while CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -4.48% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -1.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.75%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -2.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.31%.
APLD is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2025.
CLSK is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.
The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-2.50% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
APLD | CLSK | APLD / CLSK | |
Capitalization | 2.05B | 4.78B | 43% |
EBITDA | -4.15M | 60.4M | -7% |
Gain YTD | 43.769 | 12.058 | 363% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 190M | 216M | 88% |
Total Cash | 58.2M | 176M | 33% |
Total Debt | 426M | 15.2M | 2,803% |
APLD | CLSK | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | 70 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 80 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 87 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
APLD's Valuation (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CLSK (70). This means that APLD’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
APLD's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as CLSK (80). This means that APLD’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as APLD (98). This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to APLD’s over the last 12 months.
APLD's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as CLSK (56). This means that APLD’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's P/E Growth Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as APLD (100). This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to APLD’s over the last 12 months.
APLD | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago89% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago89% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APLD has been loosely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if APLD jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To APLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
APLD | 100% | -3.20% | ||
CLSK - APLD | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
RIOT - APLD | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
WULF - APLD | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
HIVE - APLD | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.04% | ||
MARA - APLD | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.16% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSK has been closely correlated with RIOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSK jumps, then RIOT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSK | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CLSK | 100% | -0.96% | ||
RIOT - CLSK | 84% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
MARA - CLSK | 81% Closely correlated | +0.16% | ||
BITF - CLSK | 79% Closely correlated | -1.43% | ||
HIVE - CLSK | 77% Closely correlated | -2.04% | ||
COIN - CLSK | 74% Closely correlated | -1.16% | ||
More |