Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
APHGX vs TEDSX
APHGX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts APHGX vs TEDSX
Artisan Global Value Institutional
Price$28.30
Change-$0.24 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.82B
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$32.44
Change-$0.36 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.43B
APHGX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
APHGX vs. TEDSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APHGX is a Buy and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.43B vs. APHGX (2.82B). APHGX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: APHGX (1.03) vs TEDSX (0.75). APHGX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: APHGX (13 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than APHGX (1.03). TEDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.55 vs. APHGX (16.35). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than APHGX: TEDSX (1000) vs APHGX (1000000). APHGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.42 vs. TEDSX (5.08). APHGX return over 5 years is better than : 63.86 vs. TEDSX (27.14).
| APHGX | TEDSX | APHGX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.96 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.96 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.551 | 16.851 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.82B | 9.43B | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.75 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.42 | 5.08 | 422% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.34 | 17.27 | 378% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.86 | 27.14 | 235% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.20 | 10.70 | 983% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers