Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
APHGX vs TEDSX
APHGX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts APHGX vs TEDSX
Artisan Global Value Institutional
Price$29.38
Change+$1.65 (+5.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.94B
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$32.38
Change-$0.11 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.71B
APHGX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
APHGX vs. TEDSX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APHGX is a Buy and TEDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.71B vs. APHGX (2.94B). APHGX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: APHGX (1.03) vs TEDSX (0.79). APHGX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: APHGX (14 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than APHGX (1.03). TEDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.55 vs. APHGX (17.38). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than APHGX: TEDSX (1000) vs APHGX (1000000). APHGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.81 vs. TEDSX (11.97). APHGX return over 5 years is better than : 56.41 vs. TEDSX (16.32).
| APHGX | TEDSX | APHGX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.96 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.96 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.184 | 3.450 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.94B | 9.71B | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.79 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.81 | 11.97 | 216% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.39 | 15.51 | 396% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.41 | 16.32 | 346% |
| Returns for 10 years | 145.40 | 29.34 | 496% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement