Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
APHGX vs TEDSX
APHGX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts APHGX vs TEDSX
Artisan Global Value Institutional
Price$27.91
Change+$0.22 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.77B
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$32.74
Change+$0.18 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.47B
APHGX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
APHGX vs. TEDSX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APHGX is a Hold and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.47B vs. APHGX (2.77B). APHGX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: APHGX (1.04) vs TEDSX (0.85). APHGX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: APHGX (13 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than APHGX (1.03). TEDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.55 vs. APHGX (16.35). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than APHGX: TEDSX (1000) vs APHGX (1000000). APHGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.36 vs. TEDSX (2.93). APHGX return over 5 years is better than : 74.98 vs. TEDSX (36.44).
| APHGX | TEDSX | APHGX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.96 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.96 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.691 | 16.637 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.77B | 9.47B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.85 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.36 | 2.93 | 593% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.26 | 28.46 | 268% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.98 | 36.44 | 206% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.83 | 9.22 | 1,072% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers