APH
Price
$109.21
Change
-$1.53 (-1.38%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
133.34B
65 days until earnings call
TTDKF
Price
$13.35
Change
-$0.36 (-2.63%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
24.73B
Interact to see
Advertisement

APH vs TTDKF

Header iconAPH vs TTDKF Comparison
Open Charts APH vs TTDKFBanner chart's image
Amphenol
Price$109.21
Change-$1.53 (-1.38%)
Volume$6.54M
Capitalization133.34B
TDK
Price$13.35
Change-$0.36 (-2.63%)
Volume$3.34K
Capitalization24.73B
APH vs TTDKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
APH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TTDKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APH vs. TTDKF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APH is a Hold and TTDKF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (APH: $109.21 vs. TTDKF: $13.35)
Brand notoriety: APH and TTDKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APH: 73% vs. TTDKF: 49%
Market capitalization -- APH: $133.34B vs. TTDKF: $24.73B
APH [@Electronic Components] is valued at $133.34B. TTDKF’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $24.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $133.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $7.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APH’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTTDKF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • APH’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TTDKF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, APH is a better buy in the long-term than TTDKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APH’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTDKF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TTDKF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TTDKF is a better buy in the short-term than APH.

Price Growth

APH (@Electronic Components) experienced а -0.70% price change this week, while TTDKF (@Electronic Components) price change was +7.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +2.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

APH is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+2.55% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APH($133B) has a higher market cap than TTDKF($24.7B). APH has higher P/E ratio than TTDKF: APH (43.51) vs TTDKF (22.34). APH YTD gains are higher at: 57.936 vs. TTDKF (11.469). TTDKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 446B vs. APH (5.07B). TTDKF has more cash in the bank: 752B vs. APH (3.23B). APH has less debt than TTDKF: APH (8.06B) vs TTDKF (687B). TTDKF has higher revenues than APH: TTDKF (2.13T) vs APH (18.8B).
APHTTDKFAPH / TTDKF
Capitalization133B24.7B538%
EBITDA5.07B446B1%
Gain YTD57.93611.469505%
P/E Ratio43.5122.34195%
Revenue18.8B2.13T1%
Total Cash3.23B752B0%
Total Debt8.06B687B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APH vs TTDKF: Fundamental Ratings
APH
TTDKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5030
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
469
SMR RATING
1..100
314
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
339
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3644
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TTDKF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as APH (51) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that TTDKF’s stock grew similarly to APH’s over the last 12 months.

APH's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TTDKF (69) in the null industry. This means that APH’s stock grew somewhat faster than TTDKF’s over the last 12 months.

TTDKF's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as APH (31) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that TTDKF’s stock grew similarly to APH’s over the last 12 months.

APH's Price Growth Rating (3) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TTDKF (39) in the null industry. This means that APH’s stock grew somewhat faster than TTDKF’s over the last 12 months.

APH's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as TTDKF (44) in the null industry. This means that APH’s stock grew similarly to TTDKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APHTTDKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TTDKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IFF65.820.10
+0.15%
International Flavors & Fragrances
RLX2.13-0.01
-0.47%
RLX Technology
SKK0.43N/A
-0.47%
SKK Holdings Ltd
KVHI5.36-0.09
-1.65%
KVH Industries
SKYT11.41-0.40
-3.39%
SkyWater Technology

APH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APH has been closely correlated with CLS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APH jumps, then CLS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APH
1D Price
Change %
APH100%
-1.38%
CLS - APH
69%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
FN - APH
68%
Closely correlated
+2.40%
GLW - APH
67%
Closely correlated
-0.49%
TEL - APH
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.06%
JBL - APH
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
More

TTDKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTDKF has been loosely correlated with TTDKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTDKF jumps, then TTDKY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TTDKF
1D Price
Change %
TTDKF100%
-2.61%
TTDKY - TTDKF
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
APELF - TTDKF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
APH - TTDKF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.38%
OLED - TTDKF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
PLXS - TTDKF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.29%
More