APH
Price
$109.21
Change
-$1.53 (-1.38%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
135.2B
67 days until earnings call
FN
Price
$329.80
Change
+$7.72 (+2.40%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
11.54B
2 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

APH vs FN

Header iconAPH vs FN Comparison
Open Charts APH vs FNBanner chart's image
Amphenol
Price$109.21
Change-$1.53 (-1.38%)
Volume$6.54M
Capitalization135.2B
Fabrinet
Price$329.80
Change+$7.72 (+2.40%)
Volume$866.76K
Capitalization11.54B
APH vs FN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
APH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APH vs. FN commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APH is a Hold and FN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (APH: $110.74 vs. FN: $322.08)
Brand notoriety: APH and FN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APH: 70% vs. FN: 242%
Market capitalization -- APH: $135.2B vs. FN: $11.54B
APH [@Electronic Components] is valued at $135.2B. FN’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $11.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $135.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $7.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APH’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • APH’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, APH is a better buy in the long-term than FN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FN’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, APH is a better buy in the short-term than FN.

Price Growth

APH (@Electronic Components) experienced а +2.02% price change this week, while FN (@Electronic Components) price change was -3.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +2.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

APH is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

FN is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+2.55% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APH($135B) has a higher market cap than FN($11.5B). APH has higher P/E ratio than FN: APH (44.12) vs FN (35.91). APH YTD gains are higher at: 60.149 vs. FN (46.480). APH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.07B vs. FN (399M). APH has more cash in the bank: 3.23B vs. FN (951M). FN has less debt than APH: FN (5.72M) vs APH (8.06B). APH has higher revenues than FN: APH (18.8B) vs FN (3.26B).
APHFNAPH / FN
Capitalization135B11.5B1,174%
EBITDA5.07B399M1,270%
Gain YTD60.14946.480129%
P/E Ratio44.1235.91123%
Revenue18.8B3.26B576%
Total Cash3.23B951M339%
Total Debt8.06B5.72M140,919%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APH vs FN: Fundamental Ratings
APH
FN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7712
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
314
SMR RATING
1..100
3149
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
338
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3528
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

APH's Valuation (52) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as FN (71). This means that APH’s stock grew similarly to FN’s over the last 12 months.

APH's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as FN (14). This means that APH’s stock grew similarly to FN’s over the last 12 months.

APH's SMR Rating (31) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as FN (49). This means that APH’s stock grew similarly to FN’s over the last 12 months.

APH's Price Growth Rating (3) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FN (38). This means that APH’s stock grew somewhat faster than FN’s over the last 12 months.

FN's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as APH (35). This means that FN’s stock grew similarly to APH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APHFN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALPINE.X1.299484-0.084730
-6.12%
Alpine F1 Team Fan Token cryptocurrency
GAS.X3.219023-0.220094
-6.40%
Gas cryptocurrency
GLMR.X0.074139-0.006998
-8.62%
Moonbeam cryptocurrency
NU.X0.053392-0.005265
-8.98%
NuCypher cryptocurrency
BONK.X0.000024-0.000004
-13.22%
Bonk cryptocurrency

APH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APH has been closely correlated with CLS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APH jumps, then CLS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APH
1D Price
Change %
APH100%
+0.83%
CLS - APH
69%
Closely correlated
-3.71%
FN - APH
68%
Closely correlated
-4.52%
GLW - APH
67%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
TEL - APH
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
JBL - APH
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
More

FN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FN has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FN jumps, then APH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FN
1D Price
Change %
FN100%
-4.52%
APH - FN
68%
Closely correlated
+0.83%
CLS - FN
63%
Loosely correlated
-3.71%
FLEX - FN
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.81%
GLW - FN
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
JBL - FN
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
More