APH
Price
$127.36
Change
+$1.76 (+1.40%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Capitalization
155.5B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
FN
Price
$412.46
Change
+$14.36 (+3.61%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Capitalization
14.74B
24 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

APH vs FN

Header iconAPH vs FN Comparison
Open Charts APH vs FNBanner chart's image
Amphenol
Price$127.36
Change+$1.76 (+1.40%)
Volume$6.94M
Capitalization155.5B
Fabrinet
Price$412.46
Change+$14.36 (+3.61%)
Volume$896.2K
Capitalization14.74B
APH vs FN Comparison Chart in %
APH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APH vs. FN commentary
Oct 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APH is a Hold and FN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 17, 2025
Stock price -- (APH: $127.36 vs. FN: $412.46)
Brand notoriety: APH and FN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APH: 85% vs. FN: 126%
Market capitalization -- APH: $155.5B vs. FN: $14.74B
APH [@Electronic Components] is valued at $155.5B. FN’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $14.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $155.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $8.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APH’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileFN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • APH’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • FN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, APH is a better buy in the long-term than FN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APH’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FN is a better buy in the short-term than APH.

Price Growth

APH (@Electronic Components) experienced а +0.88% price change this week, while FN (@Electronic Components) price change was +7.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

APH is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

FN is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+0.19% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APH($155B) has a higher market cap than FN($14.7B). APH has higher P/E ratio than FN: APH (50.74) vs FN (44.98). FN (87.584) and APH (84.440) have similar YTD gains . APH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.07B vs. FN (409M). FN has less debt than APH: FN (5.47M) vs APH (8.06B). APH has higher revenues than FN: APH (18.8B) vs FN (3.42B).
APHFNAPH / FN
Capitalization155B14.7B1,054%
EBITDA5.07B409M1,239%
Gain YTD84.44087.58496%
P/E Ratio50.7444.98113%
Revenue18.8B3.42B550%
Total CashN/A934M-
Total Debt8.06B5.47M147,359%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APH vs FN: Fundamental Ratings
APH
FN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7471
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
310
SMR RATING
1..100
3149
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
539
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2218
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

APH's Valuation (56) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as FN (72). This means that APH’s stock grew similarly to FN’s over the last 12 months.

APH's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as FN (10). This means that APH’s stock grew similarly to FN’s over the last 12 months.

APH's SMR Rating (31) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as FN (49). This means that APH’s stock grew similarly to FN’s over the last 12 months.

APH's Price Growth Rating (5) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FN (39). This means that APH’s stock grew somewhat faster than FN’s over the last 12 months.

FN's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as APH (22). This means that FN’s stock grew similarly to APH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APHFN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
57%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XNOV36.58-0.09
-0.25%
FT Vest US Eq Enh & Mod Buf ETF-Nov
WEEL20.06-0.11
-0.52%
Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF
GVIP151.83-1.41
-0.92%
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
IZRL28.87-0.36
-1.24%
ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF
IYC102.19-1.31
-1.27%
iShares US Consumer Discretionary ETF

FN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FN has been loosely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FN jumps, then APH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FN
1D Price
Change %
FN100%
+3.54%
APH - FN
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.40%
CLS - FN
64%
Loosely correlated
+3.67%
FLEX - FN
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
GLW - FN
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
BHE - FN
55%
Loosely correlated
+3.37%
More