Advertisement
APG vs MTZ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APG is a StrongBuy and MTZ is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMTZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- APG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MTZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- APG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MTZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
APG (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -0.36% price change this week, while MTZ (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +3.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +0.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.56%.
Reported Earning Dates
APG is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2026.
MTZ is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (+0.59% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| APG | MTZ | APG / MTZ | |
| Capitalization | 16.2B | 16.7B | 97% |
| EBITDA | 803M | 978M | 82% |
| Gain YTD | 61.927 | 56.435 | 110% |
| P/E Ratio | 108.28 | 50.51 | 214% |
| Revenue | 7.4B | 13B | 57% |
| Total Cash | 432M | 191M | 226% |
| Total Debt | 3.06B | 2.67B | 115% |
APG | MTZ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 19 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 85 | 72 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MTZ's Valuation (84) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as APG (91) in the null industry. This means that MTZ’s stock grew similarly to APG’s over the last 12 months.
APG's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as MTZ (19) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that APG’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
MTZ's SMR Rating (72) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as APG (85) in the null industry. This means that MTZ’s stock grew similarly to APG’s over the last 12 months.
APG's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as MTZ (43) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that APG’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
APG's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MTZ (96) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that APG’s stock grew significantly faster than MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
| APG | MTZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 46% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 57% | 6 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 72% | 6 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 72% | 6 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 69% | 6 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 71% | 6 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 60% | about 1 month ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 56% | 6 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 74% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EPP | 50.63 | 0.22 | +0.44% |
| iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF | |||
| SAMT | 37.39 | 0.08 | +0.21% |
| Strategas Macro Thematic Opp ETF | |||
| SPMV | 50.19 | N/A | N/A |
| Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF | |||
| RITPF | 27.50 | N/A | N/A |
| RIT Capital Partners Plc. | |||
| FPFD | 21.85 | -0.01 | -0.03% |
| Fidelity Preferred Securities & Inc ETF | |||
APG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APG has been loosely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if APG jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.
MTZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTZ has been closely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTZ jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTZ | 100% | +0.39% | ||
| PWR - MTZ | 85% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| FIX - MTZ | 81% Closely correlated | -2.66% | ||
| STRL - MTZ | 79% Closely correlated | +2.27% | ||
| PRIM - MTZ | 79% Closely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| EME - MTZ | 78% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
More | ||||