It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBLD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BLD’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
APG (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +5.44% price change this week, while BLD (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +8.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +163.27%.
APG is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2026.
BLD is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.
Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| APG | BLD | APG / BLD | |
| Capitalization | 15.6B | 11.9B | 131% |
| EBITDA | 803M | 1.02B | 79% |
| Gain YTD | 59.967 | 41.315 | 145% |
| P/E Ratio | 104.25 | 21.59 | 483% |
| Revenue | 7.4B | 5.22B | 142% |
| Total Cash | 432M | 842M | 51% |
| Total Debt | 3.06B | 2.08B | 147% |
APG | BLD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 69 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 38 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 85 | 36 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 23 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BLD's Valuation (69) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as APG (93) in the null industry. This means that BLD’s stock grew similarly to APG’s over the last 12 months.
APG's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as BLD (38) in the Building Products industry. This means that APG’s stock grew similarly to BLD’s over the last 12 months.
BLD's SMR Rating (36) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APG (85) in the null industry. This means that BLD’s stock grew somewhat faster than APG’s over the last 12 months.
APG's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as BLD (46) in the Building Products industry. This means that APG’s stock grew similarly to BLD’s over the last 12 months.
APG's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as BLD (23) in the Building Products industry. This means that APG’s stock grew similarly to BLD’s over the last 12 months.
| APG | BLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 60% | 9 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 69% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DNOV | 47.60 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| FT Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF Nov | |||
| SOLR | 31.79 | N/A | N/A |
| SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF | |||
| QMNV | 22.64 | N/A | -0.02% |
| FT Vest Nasdaq-100® Mod Buffr ETF – Nov | |||
| GAM | 63.67 | -0.10 | -0.16% |
| General American Investors Company | |||
| GDXD | 12.87 | -1.50 | -10.44% |
| MicroSectors™ Gold Mns 3X Inv Lvrgd ETN | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APG has been loosely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if APG jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLD has been loosely correlated with ACA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLD jumps, then ACA could also see price increases.