APEUF
Price
$0.68
Change
+$0.05 (+7.94%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
66.94M
CODGF
Price
$115.05
Change
+$7.75 (+7.22%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
34.53B
Interact to see
Advertisement

APEUF vs CODGF

Header iconAPEUF vs CODGF Comparison
Open Charts APEUF vs CODGFBanner chart's image
Atlas Engineered Products
Price$0.68
Change+$0.05 (+7.94%)
Volume$13.28K
Capitalization66.94M
Compagnie de Saint-Gobain
Price$115.05
Change+$7.75 (+7.22%)
Volume$257
Capitalization34.53B
APEUF vs CODGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
APEUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CODGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APEUF vs. CODGF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APEUF is a Hold and CODGF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (APEUF: $0.68 vs. CODGF: $115.05)
Brand notoriety: APEUF and CODGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APEUF: 78% vs. CODGF: 19%
Market capitalization -- APEUF: $66.94M vs. CODGF: $34.53B
APEUF [@Building Products] is valued at $66.94M. CODGF’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $34.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $67.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $12.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APEUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCODGF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • APEUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CODGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CODGF is a better buy in the long-term than APEUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APEUF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CODGF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APEUF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CODGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CODGF is a better buy in the short-term than APEUF.

Price Growth

APEUF (@Building Products) experienced а +10.06% price change this week, while CODGF (@Building Products) price change was +5.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was +2.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.93%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (+2.77% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CODGF($34.5B) has a higher market cap than APEUF($66.9M). APEUF has higher P/E ratio than CODGF: APEUF (21.39) vs CODGF (11.51). CODGF YTD gains are higher at: 28.345 vs. APEUF (-26.091). CODGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.04B vs. APEUF (13M). CODGF has more cash in the bank: 6.21B vs. APEUF (14.6M). APEUF has less debt than CODGF: APEUF (17.7M) vs CODGF (14.7B). CODGF has higher revenues than APEUF: CODGF (42.5B) vs APEUF (53.5M).
APEUFCODGFAPEUF / CODGF
Capitalization66.9M34.5B0%
EBITDA13M6.04B0%
Gain YTD-26.09128.345-92%
P/E Ratio21.3911.51186%
Revenue53.5M42.5B0%
Total Cash14.6M6.21B0%
Total Debt17.7M14.7B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APEUF vs CODGF: Fundamental Ratings
APEUF
CODGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5117
SMR RATING
1..100
9098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6244
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
227
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CODGF's Valuation (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APEUF (78). This means that CODGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than APEUF’s over the last 12 months.

CODGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APEUF (51). This means that CODGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than APEUF’s over the last 12 months.

APEUF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as CODGF (98). This means that APEUF’s stock grew similarly to CODGF’s over the last 12 months.

CODGF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as APEUF (62). This means that CODGF’s stock grew similarly to APEUF’s over the last 12 months.

APEUF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as CODGF (27). This means that APEUF’s stock grew similarly to CODGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APEUFCODGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APEUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CODGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NPPXF1.04N/A
+0.48%
Nippon Telegraph & Telephone Corp.
BECVY2.07N/A
N/A
Bec World Public Co., Ltd.
KLPEF38.37N/A
N/A
Klepierre SA
SEXHF0.57N/A
N/A
Sichaun Expressway Co., Ltd.
CLSH0.04N/A
-2.78%
CLS Holdings USA, Inc.

APEUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that APEUF and GBERY have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that APEUF and GBERY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APEUF
1D Price
Change %
APEUF100%
N/A
GBERY - APEUF
19%
Poorly correlated
+1.71%
DKILF - APEUF
13%
Poorly correlated
+5.62%
CODYY - APEUF
13%
Poorly correlated
+3.28%
CODGF - APEUF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BURCA - APEUF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CODGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CODGF and NIABY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CODGF and NIABY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CODGF
1D Price
Change %
CODGF100%
N/A
NIABY - CODGF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CODYY - CODGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.28%
SWIM - CODGF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
GBERY - CODGF
19%
Poorly correlated
+1.71%
APEUF - CODGF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More