APELF vs TTDKF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APELF is a Hold and TTDKF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APELF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTTDKF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- APELF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TTDKF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Price Growth
APELF (@Electronic Components) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TTDKF (@Electronic Components) price change was -4.17% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -0.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.71%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Components (-0.59% weekly)The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
| APELF | TTDKF | APELF / TTDKF | |
| Capitalization | 2.05B | 24.2B | 8% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.891 | 39.208 | 66% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 49.18 | - |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
APELF | TTDKF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 41 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 10 Undervalued | 24 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 61 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 71 | 75 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
APELF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as TTDKF (24). This means that APELF’s stock grew similarly to TTDKF’s over the last 12 months.
TTDKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APELF (100). This means that TTDKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than APELF’s over the last 12 months.
APELF's SMR Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as TTDKF (75). This means that APELF’s stock grew similarly to TTDKF’s over the last 12 months.
TTDKF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as APELF (47). This means that TTDKF’s stock grew similarly to APELF’s over the last 12 months.
TTDKF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for APELF (95). This means that TTDKF’s stock grew significantly faster than APELF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
APELF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APELF has been loosely correlated with BHE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if APELF jumps, then BHE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To APELF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| APELF | 100% | N/A | ||
| BHE - APELF | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| TTDKF - APELF | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.38% | ||
| APELY - APELF | 18% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HNHPF - APELF | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.76% | ||
| BCNAF - APELF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
TTDKF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTDKF has been loosely correlated with TTDKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTDKF jumps, then TTDKY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTDKF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTDKF | 100% | +2.38% | ||
| TTDKY - TTDKF | 37% Loosely correlated | -2.74% | ||
| APELF - TTDKF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| APH - TTDKF | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.30% | ||
| OLED - TTDKF | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.69% | ||
| PLXS - TTDKF | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.39% | ||
More | ||||