APELF
Price
$10.00
Change
-$0.34 (-3.29%)
Updated
Apr 30 closing price
Capitalization
1.96B
BCNAF
Price
$12.90
Change
+$1.40 (+12.17%)
Updated
Apr 22 closing price
Capitalization
1.27B
Interact to see
Advertisement

APELF vs BCNAF

Header iconAPELF vs BCNAF Comparison
Open Charts APELF vs BCNAFBanner chart's image
Alps Alpine
Price$10.00
Change-$0.34 (-3.29%)
Volume$400
Capitalization1.96B
Bar
Price$12.90
Change+$1.40 (+12.17%)
Volume$15
Capitalization1.27B
APELF vs BCNAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APELF vs. BCNAF commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APELF is a Hold and BCNAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (APELF: $10.00 vs. BCNAF: $12.90)
Brand notoriety: APELF and BCNAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APELF: 123% vs. BCNAF: 70%
Market capitalization -- APELF: $1.96B vs. BCNAF: $1.27B
APELF [@Electronic Components] is valued at $1.96B. BCNAF’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $1.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $111.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $6.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APELF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBCNAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • APELF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BCNAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, APELF is a better buy in the long-term than BCNAF.

Price Growth

APELF (@Electronic Components) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BCNAF (@Electronic Components) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.41%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+1.77% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APELF($1.97B) has a higher market cap than BCNAF($1.27B). BCNAF has higher P/E ratio than APELF: BCNAF (16.01) vs APELF (7.84). BCNAF YTD gains are higher at: -0.769 vs. APELF (-5.660). APELF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 16.1B vs. BCNAF (118M). APELF has more cash in the bank: 85.1B vs. BCNAF (363M). BCNAF has less debt than APELF: BCNAF (104M) vs APELF (98.9B). APELF has higher revenues than BCNAF: APELF (979B) vs BCNAF (947M).
APELFBCNAFAPELF / BCNAF
Capitalization1.97B1.27B155%
EBITDA16.1B118M13,644%
Gain YTD-5.660-0.769736%
P/E Ratio7.8416.0149%
Revenue979B947M103,379%
Total Cash85.1B363M23,444%
Total Debt98.9B104M95,096%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APELF vs BCNAF: Fundamental Ratings
APELF
BCNAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
1174
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5274
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10072
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCNAF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is in the same range as APELF (6). This means that BCNAF’s stock grew similarly to APELF’s over the last 12 months.

BCNAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as APELF (100). This means that BCNAF’s stock grew similarly to APELF’s over the last 12 months.

APELF's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCNAF (74). This means that APELF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCNAF’s over the last 12 months.

APELF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as BCNAF (74). This means that APELF’s stock grew similarly to BCNAF’s over the last 12 months.

BCNAF's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as APELF (100). This means that BCNAF’s stock grew similarly to APELF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACGIX21.84-0.20
-0.91%
Invesco Growth and Income A
BLRAX11.72-0.11
-0.93%
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate A
ANCFX84.28-0.95
-1.11%
American Funds Fundamental Invs A
PINPX15.51-0.18
-1.15%
Principal Diversified Intl R5
WFTIX13.13-0.22
-1.65%
Allspring Innovation Fund - Class Inst

APELF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APELF has been loosely correlated with BHE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if APELF jumps, then BHE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APELF
1D Price
Change %
APELF100%
N/A
BHE - APELF
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.18%
TTDKF - APELF
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.73%
APELY - APELF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HNHPF - APELF
12%
Poorly correlated
-2.42%
BCNAF - APELF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BCNAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCNAF has been loosely correlated with VEMLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCNAF jumps, then VEMLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCNAF
1D Price
Change %
BCNAF100%
N/A
VEMLF - BCNAF
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AITUY - BCNAF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HPHTF - BCNAF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
APELF - BCNAF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AITUF - BCNAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More