It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIOSP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IOSP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
APD (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +0.98% price change this week, while IOSP (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +1.54% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -3.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.79%.
APD is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
IOSP is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.
The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
APD | IOSP | APD / IOSP | |
Capitalization | 54.1B | 3.21B | 1,687% |
EBITDA | 4.5B | 201M | 2,236% |
Gain YTD | 17.718 | -0.548 | -3,233% |
P/E Ratio | 23.27 | 22.73 | 102% |
Revenue | 12.4B | 1.95B | 636% |
Total Cash | 2.23B | 204M | 1,095% |
Total Debt | 12.7B | 45.2M | 28,097% |
APD | IOSP | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 97 Overvalued | 65 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 40 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 55 | 62 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 67 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IOSP's Valuation (65) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as APD (97). This means that IOSP’s stock grew similarly to APD’s over the last 12 months.
APD's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as IOSP (40). This means that APD’s stock grew similarly to IOSP’s over the last 12 months.
APD's SMR Rating (55) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as IOSP (62). This means that APD’s stock grew similarly to IOSP’s over the last 12 months.
APD's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as IOSP (49). This means that APD’s stock grew similarly to IOSP’s over the last 12 months.
IOSP's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as APD (89). This means that IOSP’s stock grew similarly to APD’s over the last 12 months.
APD | IOSP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago54% | 1 day ago70% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 1 day ago68% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago57% | 1 day ago62% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago45% | 1 day ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago58% | 1 day ago68% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago48% | 1 day ago62% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago61% | 5 days ago68% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago59% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago77% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago52% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APD has been loosely correlated with ALTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if APD jumps, then ALTO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To APD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
APD | 100% | +0.96% | ||
ALTO - APD | 47% Loosely correlated | +5.34% | ||
CMT - APD | 37% Loosely correlated | +2.01% | ||
HWKN - APD | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
PPG - APD | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
IOSP - APD | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.06% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IOSP has been loosely correlated with BCPC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IOSP jumps, then BCPC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IOSP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IOSP | 100% | +0.06% | ||
BCPC - IOSP | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
NGVT - IOSP | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.92% | ||
AXTA - IOSP | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
ECVT - IOSP | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.86% | ||
KWR - IOSP | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.78% | ||
More |