APAJF
Price
$5.50
Change
-$0.37 (-6.31%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
7.65B
CGHOF
Price
$1.00
Change
+$0.07 (+7.53%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
5.5B
Interact to see
Advertisement

APAJF vs CGHOF

Header iconAPAJF vs CGHOF Comparison
Open Charts APAJF vs CGHOFBanner chart's image
APA Group Stapled Security
Price$5.50
Change-$0.37 (-6.31%)
Volume$221
Capitalization7.65B
China Gas Holdings
Price$1.00
Change+$0.07 (+7.53%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization5.5B
APAJF vs CGHOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
APAJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APAJF vs. CGHOF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APAJF is a Hold and CGHOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (APAJF: $5.49 vs. CGHOF: $1.00)
Brand notoriety: APAJF and CGHOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Gas Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APAJF: 29% vs. CGHOF: 100%
Market capitalization -- APAJF: $7.67B vs. CGHOF: $5.41B
APAJF [@Gas Distributors] is valued at $7.67B. CGHOF’s [@Gas Distributors] market capitalization is $5.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Gas Distributors] industry ranges from $30.19B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Gas Distributors] industry is $8.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APAJF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCGHOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • APAJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CGHOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGHOF is a better buy in the long-term than APAJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APAJF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • APAJF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

APAJF (@Gas Distributors) experienced а -6.07% price change this week, while CGHOF (@Gas Distributors) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Gas Distributors industry was +2.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.46%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Gas Distributors (+2.33% weekly)

Gas distributors are involved in moving and selling gas – from wellheads or over-distribution systems operated by other firms – to residential and non-residential customers. These companies perform tasks such as the gathering and processing of gas, intrastate and interstate transport, and delivery to the customer. Some of the biggest gas distributing companies in the U.S. include Sempra Energy, Avangrid Inc and Atmos Energy Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APAJF($7.65B) has a higher market cap than CGHOF($5.5B). APAJF has higher P/E ratio than CGHOF: APAJF (109.21) vs CGHOF (12.96). APAJF YTD gains are higher at: 37.375 vs. CGHOF (17.647). CGHOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.96B vs. APAJF (1.94B). CGHOF has more cash in the bank: 9.23B vs. APAJF (800M). APAJF has less debt than CGHOF: APAJF (14B) vs CGHOF (60.6B). CGHOF has higher revenues than APAJF: CGHOF (80.5B) vs APAJF (3.18B).
APAJFCGHOFAPAJF / CGHOF
Capitalization7.65B5.5B139%
EBITDA1.94B6.96B28%
Gain YTD37.37517.647212%
P/E Ratio109.2112.96842%
Revenue3.18B80.5B4%
Total Cash800M9.23B9%
Total Debt14B60.6B23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APAJF vs CGHOF: Fundamental Ratings
APAJF
CGHOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3145
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9899
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5450
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
124
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CGHOF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APAJF (63). This means that CGHOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than APAJF’s over the last 12 months.

CGHOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as APAJF (100). This means that CGHOF’s stock grew similarly to APAJF’s over the last 12 months.

APAJF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as CGHOF (99). This means that APAJF’s stock grew similarly to CGHOF’s over the last 12 months.

CGHOF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as APAJF (54). This means that CGHOF’s stock grew similarly to APAJF’s over the last 12 months.

APAJF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as CGHOF (24). This means that APAJF’s stock grew similarly to CGHOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APAJFCGHOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APAJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IVRA16.720.17
+1.00%
Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF
IVLU35.420.27
+0.77%
iShares Edge MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF
RSMV26.560.09
+0.34%
Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF
NXTG103.14-0.01
-0.01%
First Trust IndXX NextG ETF
NMT11.62-0.01
-0.09%
Nuveen Massachusetts Quality Municipal Income Fund

APAJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that APAJF and CGHOF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that APAJF and CGHOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APAJF
1D Price
Change %
APAJF100%
N/A
CGHOF - APAJF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ENGGF - APAJF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGHLY - APAJF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RGCO - APAJF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
BIPC - APAJF
-4%
Poorly correlated
+2.63%
More

CGHOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CGHOF and OPAL have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGHOF and OPAL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGHOF
1D Price
Change %
CGHOF100%
N/A
OPAL - CGHOF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
APAJF - CGHOF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGHLY - CGHOF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NFE - CGHOF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-6.00%
BIPC - CGHOF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+2.63%
More