APAC
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
80.99M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SMAP
Price
$25.63
Change
+$0.74 (+2.97%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Net Assets
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

APAC vs SMAP

Header iconAPAC vs SMAP Comparison
Open Charts APAC vs SMAPBanner chart's image
StoneBridge Acquisition II
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization80.99M
Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF
Price$25.63
Change+$0.74 (+2.97%)
Volume$214
Net AssetsN/A
APAC vs SMAP Comparison Chart in %
SMAP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APAC vs. SMAP commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APAC is a StrongBuy and SMAP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (APAC: $10.06)
Brand notoriety:
Market capitalization --

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.

  • APAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.

Price Growth

APAC (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.10% price change this weekfor the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +60.57%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.26% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMAP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SMAP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DOGG22.210.17
+0.79%
FT Vest DJIA® Dogs 10 Trgt Inc ETF
GUT5.940.02
+0.34%
Gabelli Utility Trust
SPTB30.320.02
+0.07%
State Street® SPDR® Portfolio Trs ETF
BNDS51.150.01
+0.02%
Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF
MEAR50.41-0.02
-0.04%
iShares Short Maturity Muni Bd Act ETF

APAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APAC has been loosely correlated with TWLV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if APAC jumps, then TWLV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APAC
1D Price
Change %
APAC100%
N/A
TWLV - APAC
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PEGR - APAC
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
JWSMF - APAC
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NETD - APAC
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SZZL - APAC
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SMAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SMAP and CXAI have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMAP and CXAI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMAP
1D Price
Change %
SMAP100%
+0.36%
CXAI - SMAP
25%
Poorly correlated
-5.58%
GIWWU - SMAP
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRON - SMAP
20%
Poorly correlated
-5.22%
APAC - SMAP
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JWSMF - SMAP
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More