Advertisement
APAC vs GLBL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APAC is a StrongBuy and GLBL is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
- APAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
APAC (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.10% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.63%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (-0.19% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| GLBL | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 36% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 23% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 17% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 23% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 21% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% |
Advertisement
APAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APAC has been loosely correlated with TWLV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if APAC jumps, then TWLV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To APAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| APAC | 100% | N/A | ||
| TWLV - APAC | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| PEGR - APAC | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| JWSMF - APAC | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NETD - APAC | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SZZL - APAC | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
GLBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLBL has been loosely correlated with APAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLBL jumps, then APAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLBL | 100% | -1.36% | ||
| APAC - GLBL | 39% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| MSFT - GLBL | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.87% | ||
| HLT - GLBL | 19% Poorly correlated | +0.55% | ||
| KIM - GLBL | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.34% | ||
| ANET - GLBL | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.74% | ||
More | ||||