APAAF
Price
$0.08
Change
+$0.01 (+14.29%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
14.77M
FKMCF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
5.17M
Interact to see
Advertisement

APAAF vs FKMCF

Header iconAPAAF vs FKMCF Comparison
Open Charts APAAF vs FKMCFBanner chart's image
APPIA RARE EARTHS & URANIUM
Price$0.08
Change+$0.01 (+14.29%)
Volume$19.46K
Capitalization14.77M
FOKUS MNG
Price$0.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$114K
Capitalization5.17M
APAAF vs FKMCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APAAF vs. FKMCF commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APAAF is a Hold and FKMCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (APAAF: $0.08 vs. FKMCF: $0.11)
Brand notoriety: APAAF and FKMCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APAAF: 36% vs. FKMCF: 122%
Market capitalization -- APAAF: $14.77M vs. FKMCF: $5.17M
APAAF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $14.77M. FKMCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $5.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APAAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFKMCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • APAAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FKMCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FKMCF is a better buy in the long-term than APAAF.

Price Growth

APAAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -6.53% price change this week, while FKMCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +0.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.32% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APAAF($14.8M) has a higher market cap than FKMCF($5.18M). APAAF YTD gains are higher at: 50.300 vs. FKMCF (5.622). FKMCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -957.41K vs. APAAF (-2.88M). APAAF has more cash in the bank: 6.74M vs. FKMCF (850K). APAAF (0) and FKMCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
APAAFFKMCFAPAAF / FKMCF
Capitalization14.8M5.18M286%
EBITDA-2.88M-957.41K301%
Gain YTD50.3005.622895%
P/E Ratio29.50N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash6.74M850K793%
Total DebtN/A1.8K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APAAF vs FKMCF: Fundamental Ratings
APAAF
FKMCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9192
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4936
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9851
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

APAAF's Valuation (69) in the null industry is in the same range as FKMCF (83). This means that APAAF’s stock grew similarly to FKMCF’s over the last 12 months.

APAAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FKMCF (100). This means that APAAF’s stock grew similarly to FKMCF’s over the last 12 months.

APAAF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as FKMCF (92). This means that APAAF’s stock grew similarly to FKMCF’s over the last 12 months.

FKMCF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as APAAF (49). This means that FKMCF’s stock grew similarly to APAAF’s over the last 12 months.

FKMCF's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APAAF (98). This means that FKMCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than APAAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NUE121.923.47
+2.93%
Nucor Corp
LSTA2.49-0.06
-2.49%
Lisata Therapeutics
CMCL19.46-0.52
-2.60%
Caledonia Mining Corp
ALGT51.05-2.64
-4.92%
Allegiant Travel Company
TRIP13.30-0.70
-5.00%
TripAdvisor

APAAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that APAAF and RTPPF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that APAAF and RTPPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APAAF
1D Price
Change %
APAAF100%
+0.94%
RTPPF - APAAF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
LRAXF - APAAF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GOLXF - APAAF
11%
Poorly correlated
+5.34%
CONXF - APAAF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FKMCF - APAAF
8%
Poorly correlated
-6.90%
More

FKMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FKMCF and ERVFF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FKMCF and ERVFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FKMCF
1D Price
Change %
FKMCF100%
-6.90%
ERVFF - FKMCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLL - FKMCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.73%
BTRYF - FKMCF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
APAAF - FKMCF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
MP - FKMCF
7%
Poorly correlated
+4.62%
More