AOXY
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.04 (-26.67%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
365.35K
CAIAF
Price
$28.00
Change
+$1.00 (+3.70%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
2.58B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AOXY vs CAIAF

Header iconAOXY vs CAIAF Comparison
Open Charts AOXY vs CAIAFBanner chart's image
Advanced Oxygen Technologies
Price$0.11
Change-$0.04 (-26.67%)
Volume$135
Capitalization365.35K
CA Immobilien Anlagen AG
Price$28.00
Change+$1.00 (+3.70%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.58B
AOXY vs CAIAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AOXY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CAIAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AOXY vs. CAIAF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOXY is a Hold and CAIAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (AOXY: $0.11 vs. CAIAF: $28.00)
Brand notoriety: AOXY and CAIAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AOXY: 26% vs. CAIAF: 22%
Market capitalization -- AOXY: $365.35K vs. CAIAF: $2.58B
AOXY [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $365.35K. CAIAF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $2.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AOXY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCAIAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AOXY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CAIAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CAIAF is a better buy in the long-term than AOXY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AOXY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CAIAF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AOXY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CAIAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CAIAF is a better buy in the short-term than AOXY.

Price Growth

AOXY (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -24.01% price change this week, while CAIAF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.66%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-0.47% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAIAF($2.58B) has a higher market cap than AOXY($365K). CAIAF has higher P/E ratio than AOXY: CAIAF (158.95) vs AOXY (86.65). AOXY YTD gains are higher at: 73.359 vs. CAIAF (-12.962). CAIAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 81.5M vs. AOXY (15.7K). CAIAF has more cash in the bank: 787M vs. AOXY (57.7K). AOXY has less debt than CAIAF: AOXY (127K) vs CAIAF (2.57B). CAIAF has higher revenues than AOXY: CAIAF (333M) vs AOXY (45.4K).
AOXYCAIAFAOXY / CAIAF
Capitalization365K2.58B0%
EBITDA15.7K81.5M0%
Gain YTD73.359-12.962-566%
P/E Ratio86.65158.9555%
Revenue45.4K333M0%
Total Cash57.7K787M0%
Total Debt127K2.57B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AOXY vs CAIAF: Fundamental Ratings
AOXY
CAIAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3839
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10096
SMR RATING
1..100
9192
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4178
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7047
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CAIAF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AOXY (94). This means that CAIAF’s stock grew significantly faster than AOXY’s over the last 12 months.

CAIAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as AOXY (100). This means that CAIAF’s stock grew similarly to AOXY’s over the last 12 months.

AOXY's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as CAIAF (92). This means that AOXY’s stock grew similarly to CAIAF’s over the last 12 months.

AOXY's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAIAF (78). This means that AOXY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAIAF’s over the last 12 months.

CAIAF's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as AOXY (70). This means that CAIAF’s stock grew similarly to AOXY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AOXYCAIAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
14%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
5%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
5%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
15%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AOXY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CAIAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ESS267.804.14
+1.57%
Essex Property Trust
FUFU3.650.02
+0.55%
BitFuFu
SBCF30.600.10
+0.33%
Seacoast Banking Corp
CHR0.77-0.01
-0.76%
Cheer Holding
ACOG7.08-0.64
-8.29%
Alpha Cognition Inc

AOXY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AOXY and BREUF have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AOXY and BREUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AOXY
1D Price
Change %
AOXY100%
-24.01%
BREUF - AOXY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CAIAF - AOXY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARPTF - AOXY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASGTF - AOXY
-1%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%

CAIAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CAIAF and STHO have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CAIAF and STHO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAIAF
1D Price
Change %
CAIAF100%
N/A
STHO - CAIAF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.93%
CWK - CAIAF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
NMRK - CAIAF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
IFSUF - CAIAF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
FSV - CAIAF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
More