AOTUF
Price
$0.66
Change
-$0.08 (-10.81%)
Updated
Feb 20 closing price
Capitalization
1.24B
MPCMF
Price
$0.85
Change
-$0.04 (-4.49%)
Updated
Apr 14 closing price
Capitalization
6.54B
Ad is loading...

AOTUF vs MPCMF

Header iconAOTUF vs MPCMF Comparison
Open Charts AOTUF vs MPCMFBanner chart's image
Precinct Properties New Zealand
Price$0.66
Change-$0.08 (-10.81%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.24B
MAPLETREE PANASIA COML TR
Price$0.85
Change-$0.04 (-4.49%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization6.54B
AOTUF vs MPCMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AOTUF vs. MPCMF commentary
Apr 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOTUF is a Hold and MPCMF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 21, 2025
Stock price -- (AOTUF: $0.66 vs. MPCMF: $0.85)
Brand notoriety: AOTUF and MPCMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AOTUF: 7% vs. MPCMF: 16%
Market capitalization -- AOTUF: $1.24B vs. MPCMF: $6.54B
AOTUF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $1.24B. MPCMF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $6.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AOTUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMPCMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AOTUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MPCMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AOTUF is a better buy in the long-term than MPCMF.

Price Growth

AOTUF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MPCMF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -5.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +3.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.94%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+3.82% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MPCMF($6.54B) has a higher market cap than AOTUF($1.24B). AOTUF has higher P/E ratio than MPCMF: AOTUF (31.95) vs MPCMF (15.72). AOTUF YTD gains are higher at: -2.293 vs. MPCMF (-7.147). MPCMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 680M vs. AOTUF (119M). MPCMF has more cash in the bank: 167M vs. AOTUF (11.5M). AOTUF has less debt than MPCMF: AOTUF (1.33B) vs MPCMF (6.71B). MPCMF has higher revenues than AOTUF: MPCMF (682M) vs AOTUF (179M).
AOTUFMPCMFAOTUF / MPCMF
Capitalization1.24B6.54B19%
EBITDA119M680M18%
Gain YTD-2.293-7.14732%
P/E Ratio31.9515.72203%
Revenue179M682M26%
Total Cash11.5M167M7%
Total Debt1.33B6.71B20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AOTUF: Fundamental Ratings
AOTUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
70
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.780.53
+2.02%
GameStop Corp
AAPL196.982.71
+1.39%
Apple
BTC.X85063.414000612.609400
+0.73%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY525.66N/A
N/A
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA241.37-0.18
-0.07%
Tesla

AOTUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AOTUF has been loosely correlated with CHTH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AOTUF jumps, then CHTH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AOTUF
1D Price
Change %
AOTUF100%
N/A
CHTH - AOTUF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KREVF - AOTUF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGIUF - AOTUF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MPCMF - AOTUF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRLAF - AOTUF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MPCMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MPCMF and STGPF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MPCMF and STGPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MPCMF
1D Price
Change %
MPCMF100%
N/A
STGPF - MPCMF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAPGF - MPCMF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AOTUF - MPCMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRPRF - MPCMF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRTI - MPCMF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More