Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AOR vs CGBL
AOR vs CGBL Comparison
Open Charts AOR vs CGBL
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allc ETF
Price$65.44
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
Volume$379.91K
Net Assets3.13B
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$35.62
Change-$0.20 (-0.56%)
Volume$624.19K
Net Assets4.41B
AOR vs CGBL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AOR vs. CGBL commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOR is a Hold and CGBL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 4.41B vs. AOR (3.13B). AOR (16.021) and CGBL (15.546) have matching annual dividend yield . AOR was incepted earlier than CGBL: AOR (17 years) vs CGBL (2 years). AOR (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than CGBL (0.33). CGBL has a higher turnover AOR (5.00) vs AOR (5.00).
| AOR | CGBL | AOR / CGBL | |
| Gain YTD | 16.021 | 15.546 | 103% |
| Net Assets | 3.13B | 4.41B | 71% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.33 | 45% |
| Turnover | 5.00 | 24.00 | 21% |
| Yield | 2.44 | 1.93 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AOR | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 65% | 11 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 5 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
AOR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AOR and FIG have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AOR and FIG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -0.56% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 75% Closely correlated | -2.78% | ||
More | ||||