Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AOR vs CGBL
AOR vs CGBL Comparison
Open Charts AOR vs CGBL
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allc ETF
Price$65.37
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
Volume$2.14K
Net Assets3.06B
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$35.21
Change-$0.10 (-0.28%)
Volume$3.81K
Net Assets4.12B
AOR vs CGBL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AOR vs. CGBL commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOR is a Buy and CGBL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 4.12B vs. AOR (3.07B). AOR has a higher annual dividend yield than CGBL: AOR (15.914) vs CGBL (14.541). AOR was incepted earlier than CGBL: AOR (17 years) vs CGBL (2 years). AOR (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than CGBL (0.33). CGBL has a higher turnover AOR (5.00) vs AOR (5.00).
| AOR | CGBL | AOR / CGBL | |
| Gain YTD | 15.914 | 14.541 | 109% |
| Net Assets | 3.07B | 4.12B | 74% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.33 | 45% |
| Turnover | 5.00 | 24.00 | 21% |
| Yield | 2.44 | 1.93 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AOR | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 64% | 17 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XSHD | 12.98 | 0.16 | +1.25% |
| Invesco S&P SmallCap Hi Div Low Vol ETF | |||
| GFEB | 41.25 | 0.11 | +0.27% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - Feb | |||
| HYS | 94.97 | 0.20 | +0.21% |
| PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corp Bd ETF | |||
| RNWZ | 27.38 | N/A | N/A |
| TrueShares Eagle Glbl Rnwbls Engy IncETF | |||
| MHNC | 16.37 | -0.28 | -1.68% |
| MAIDEN HOLDINGS NORTH AMERICA Ltd | |||
AOR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AOR and FIG have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AOR and FIG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | +0.46% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +3.26% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +1.83% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | +3.10% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 75% Closely correlated | +5.03% | ||
More | ||||