Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AOR vs CGBL
AOR vs CGBL Comparison
Open Charts AOR vs CGBL
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allc ETF
Price$62.06
Change+$0.13 (+0.21%)
Volume$180.6K
Net Assets2.59B
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$33.96
Change+$0.07 (+0.21%)
Volume$523.27K
Net Assets2.75B
AOR vs CGBL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AOR vs. CGBL commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOR is a Buy and CGBL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 2.75B vs. AOR (2.59B). CGBL (9.575) and AOR (9.572) have matching annual dividend yield . AOR was incepted earlier than CGBL: AOR (17 years) vs CGBL (2 years). AOR (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than CGBL (0.33). CGBL has a higher turnover AOR (5.00) vs AOR (5.00).
| AOR | CGBL | AOR / CGBL | |
| Gain YTD | 9.572 | 9.575 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 2.59B | 2.75B | 94% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.33 | 45% |
| Turnover | 5.00 | 24.00 | 21% |
| Yield | 2.52 | 1.93 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AOR | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 45% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 73% | 5 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 67% | 20 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EOD | 5.59 | 0.08 | +1.45% |
| Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund | |||
| HYGI | 27.46 | 0.02 | +0.09% |
| iShares Inflation Hedged Hgh Yld Bd ETF | |||
| RSF | 14.59 | 0.01 | +0.07% |
| RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund | |||
| MCDS | 55.21 | N/A | N/A |
| JPMorgan Fundamental Data Sci Md Cor ETF | |||
| BAR | 32.92 | -0.32 | -0.96% |
| GraniteShares Gold Trust | |||
AOR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AOR and FIG have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AOR and FIG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | +0.21% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +3.13% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | +1.31% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | -1.43% | ||
More | ||||