Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AOR vs CGBL
AOR vs CGBL Comparison
Open Charts AOR vs CGBL
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allc ETF
Price$61.44
Change+$0.08 (+0.13%)
Volume$105.77K
Net Assets2.54B
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$33.70
Change+$0.15 (+0.45%)
Volume$372.14K
Net Assets2.59B
AOR vs CGBL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AOR vs. CGBL commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOR is a Hold and CGBL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL (2.59B) and AOR (2.54B) have similar net assets . CGBL (8.736) and AOR (8.477) have matching annual dividend yield . AOR was incepted earlier than CGBL: AOR (17 years) vs CGBL (2 years). AOR (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than CGBL (0.33). CGBL has a higher turnover AOR (5.00) vs AOR (5.00).
| AOR | CGBL | AOR / CGBL | |
| Gain YTD | 8.477 | 8.736 | 97% |
| Net Assets | 2.54B | 2.59B | 98% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.33 | 45% |
| Turnover | 5.00 | 24.00 | 21% |
| Yield | 2.52 | 1.93 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AOR | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 17 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FXP | 10.74 | 0.22 | +2.13% |
| ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 | |||
| UFEB | 34.47 | 0.11 | +0.32% |
| Innovator US Equity Ultra Bffr ETF™ Feb | |||
| SPIN | 29.65 | 0.07 | +0.24% |
| SPDR SSGA US Equity Premium Income ETF | |||
| CXH | 7.62 | 0.01 | +0.13% |
| MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust | |||
| FLBL | 24.16 | 0.03 | +0.12% |
| Franklin Senior Loan ETF | |||
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | +0.45% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +1.18% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +3.03% | ||
| IR - CGBL | 75% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
More | ||||