Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AOR vs CGBL
AOR vs CGBL Comparison
Open Charts AOR vs CGBL
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allc ETF
Price$66.40
Change+$1.97 (+3.06%)
Volume$336.81K
Net Assets3.19B
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$35.98
Change+$1.21 (+3.48%)
Volume$986.62K
Net Assets5.03B
AOR vs CGBL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AOR vs. CGBL commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOR is a StrongBuy and CGBL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 5.03B vs. AOR (3.19B). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than AOR: CGBL (2.434) vs AOR (2.292). AOR was incepted earlier than CGBL: AOR (17 years) vs CGBL (2 years). AOR (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than CGBL (0.33). CGBL has a higher turnover AOR (5.00) vs AOR (5.00).
| AOR | CGBL | AOR / CGBL | |
| Gain YTD | 2.292 | 2.434 | 94% |
| Net Assets | 3.19B | 5.03B | 63% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.33 | 45% |
| Turnover | 5.00 | 24.00 | 21% |
| Yield | 2.50 | 1.94 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AOR | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 72% | 13 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 66% | 5 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GOOX | 83.42 | 3.06 | +3.81% |
| T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF | |||
| RWJ | 52.77 | 0.68 | +1.31% |
| Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF | |||
| FTCE | 25.51 | 0.14 | +0.54% |
| First Trust New Cstrcts Cr Erns Ldrs ETF | |||
| CPZ | 14.79 | 0.01 | +0.09% |
| Calamos Long/Short Equity & Dynamic Income Trust | |||
| BNDS | 51.15 | 0.04 | +0.07% |
| Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF | |||
AOR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AOR and FIG have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AOR and FIG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AOR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AOR | 100% | +0.21% | ||
| FIG - AOR | 14% Poorly correlated | -7.41% | ||
| WLTH - AOR | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.61% |
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | +0.42% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -1.00% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | -2.14% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 75% Closely correlated | -1.61% | ||
More | ||||