Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AOR vs CGBL
AOR vs CGBL Comparison
Open Charts AOR vs CGBL
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allc ETF
Price$62.59
Change-$0.06 (-0.10%)
Volume$194.44K
Net Assets2.65B
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$33.91
Change-$0.12 (-0.35%)
Volume$629.08K
Net Assets3.08B
AOR vs CGBL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AOR vs. CGBL commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOR is a StrongBuy and CGBL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 3.08B vs. AOR (2.65B). AOR has a higher annual dividend yield than CGBL: AOR (10.507) vs CGBL (9.414). AOR was incepted earlier than CGBL: AOR (17 years) vs CGBL (2 years). AOR (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than CGBL (0.33). CGBL has a higher turnover AOR (5.00) vs AOR (5.00).
| AOR | CGBL | AOR / CGBL | |
| Gain YTD | 10.507 | 9.414 | 112% |
| Net Assets | 2.65B | 3.08B | 86% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.33 | 45% |
| Turnover | 5.00 | 24.00 | 21% |
| Yield | 2.60 | 1.91 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AOR | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 5 days ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 73% | 5 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
AOR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AOR and FIG have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AOR and FIG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then APO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -0.35% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 79% Closely correlated | -0.92% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 79% Closely correlated | -2.59% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -1.75% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | -3.15% | ||
More | ||||