Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AOR vs CGBL
AOR vs CGBL Comparison
Open Charts AOR vs CGBL
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allc ETF
Price$64.40
Change+$0.11 (+0.17%)
Volume$381.4K
Net Assets2.85B
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$34.75
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
Volume$1.08M
Net Assets3.65B
AOR vs CGBL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AOR vs. CGBL commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOR is a Hold and CGBL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 3.65B vs. AOR (2.85B). AOR has a higher annual dividend yield than CGBL: AOR (14.177) vs CGBL (12.724). AOR was incepted earlier than CGBL: AOR (17 years) vs CGBL (2 years). AOR (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than CGBL (0.33). CGBL has a higher turnover AOR (5.00) vs AOR (5.00).
| AOR | CGBL | AOR / CGBL | |
| Gain YTD | 14.177 | 12.724 | 111% |
| Net Assets | 2.85B | 3.65B | 78% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.33 | 45% |
| Turnover | 5.00 | 24.00 | 21% |
| Yield | 2.48 | 1.96 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AOR | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 44% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LEAD | 75.69 | 0.33 | +0.44% |
| Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF | |||
| OCTU | 27.99 | 0.11 | +0.38% |
| AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 UncOctETF | |||
| USNZ | 41.49 | N/A | N/A |
| Xtrackers Net Zero Pwy Par Alg US Eq ETF | |||
| USRD | 32.97 | N/A | N/A |
| Themes US R&D Champions ETF | |||
| PSC | 56.08 | -0.22 | -0.39% |
| Principal US Small Cap ETF | |||
AOR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AOR and FIG have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AOR and FIG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | +1.83% | ||
More | ||||