Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AOPCX vs OSMCX
AOPCX vs OSMCX Comparison
Open Charts AOPCX vs OSMCX
Virtus International S/C C
Price$37.74
Change+$0.51 (+1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.37M
Invesco International Small-Mid Com C
Price$29.54
Change+$0.13 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.58B
AOPCX vs OSMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AOPCX vs. OSMCX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOPCX is a Hold and OSMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OSMCX has more cash in the bank: 2.58B vs. AOPCX (59.4M). AOPCX pays higher dividends than OSMCX: AOPCX (2.28) vs OSMCX (0.85). AOPCX was incepted earlier than OSMCX: AOPCX (16 years) vs OSMCX (28 years). AOPCX (2.71) is less costly to investors than OSMCX (2.13). AOPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. OSMCX (21.00). OSMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AOPCX: OSMCX (1000) vs AOPCX (2500). AOPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.59 vs. OSMCX (-1.32). AOPCX return over 5 years is better than : 5.90 vs. OSMCX (-38.25).
| AOPCX | OSMCX | AOPCX / OSMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 2.13 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.71 | 2.13 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.341 | 2.144 | 202% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 59.4M | 2.58B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.28 | 0.85 | 268% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.59 | -1.32 | -3,150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.32 | -15.34 | -400% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.90 | -38.25 | -15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.25 | -5.82 | -588% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement