AOMFF
Price
$26.36
Change
+$0.01 (+0.04%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
14.66B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CJPRY
Price
$14.83
Change
+$0.68 (+4.81%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
28.63B
90 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AOMFF vs CJPRY

Header iconAOMFF vs CJPRY Comparison
Open Charts AOMFF vs CJPRYBanner chart's image
Alstom
Price$26.36
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
Volume$15
Capitalization14.66B
Central Japan Railway
Price$14.83
Change+$0.68 (+4.81%)
Volume$88.34K
Capitalization28.63B
AOMFF vs CJPRY Comparison Chart in %
AOMFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CJPRY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AOMFF vs. CJPRY commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOMFF is a Hold and CJPRY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (AOMFF: $31.75 vs. CJPRY: $14.83)
Brand notoriety: AOMFF and CJPRY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Railroads industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AOMFF: 549% vs. CJPRY: 151%
Market capitalization -- AOMFF: $14.66B vs. CJPRY: $28.63B
AOMFF [@Railroads] is valued at $14.66B. CJPRY’s [@Railroads] market capitalization is $28.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Railroads] industry ranges from $143.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Railroads] industry is $18.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AOMFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCJPRY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AOMFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CJPRY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CJPRY is a better buy in the long-term than AOMFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AOMFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CJPRY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AOMFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CJPRY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AOMFF is a better buy in the short-term than CJPRY.

Price Growth

AOMFF (@Railroads) experienced а +3.62% price change this week, while CJPRY (@Railroads) price change was +6.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Railroads industry was +35.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +35.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

CJPRY is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Railroads (+35.36% weekly)

The Railroad industry includes passenger and freight transportation services along rail lines. This also includes companies that provide maintenance and switching duties as part of rail services. Within North America, the industry is largely dominated by some large operators. Several short-line railroads serve regional and local routes. Union Pacific Corporation, Canadian National Railway Company, and CSX Corporation are some of the prominent names in the business. The railroad business is relatively cyclical; economic expansion boost the freight services in particular, while economic stagnation often dampens transportation demand.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CJPRY($28.6B) has a higher market cap than AOMFF($14.7B). AOMFF has higher P/E ratio than CJPRY: AOMFF (46.40) vs CJPRY (8.64). AOMFF (8.214) and CJPRY (7.833) have similar YTD gains . CJPRY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.02T vs. AOMFF (1.36B). CJPRY has more cash in the bank: 397B vs. AOMFF (1.69B). AOMFF has less debt than CJPRY: AOMFF (3.89B) vs CJPRY (4.31T). CJPRY has higher revenues than AOMFF: CJPRY (1.94T) vs AOMFF (18.8B).
AOMFFCJPRYAOMFF / CJPRY
Capitalization14.7B28.6B51%
EBITDA1.36B1.02T0%
Gain YTD8.2147.833105%
P/E Ratio46.408.64537%
Revenue18.8B1.94T1%
Total Cash1.69B397B0%
Total Debt3.89B4.31T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AOMFF vs CJPRY: Fundamental Ratings
AOMFF
CJPRY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9176
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10086
SMR RATING
1..100
95100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4147
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7622
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AOMFF's Valuation (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CJPRY (86). This means that AOMFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CJPRY’s over the last 12 months.

CJPRY's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as AOMFF (100). This means that CJPRY’s stock grew similarly to AOMFF’s over the last 12 months.

AOMFF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as CJPRY (100). This means that AOMFF’s stock grew similarly to CJPRY’s over the last 12 months.

AOMFF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CJPRY (47). This means that AOMFF’s stock grew similarly to CJPRY’s over the last 12 months.

CJPRY's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AOMFF (76). This means that CJPRY’s stock grew somewhat faster than AOMFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AOMFFCJPRY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AOMFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CJPRY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ETQ62.660.74
+1.20%
T-REX 2X Inverse Ether Daily Target ETF
FXR86.850.44
+0.51%
First Trust Indtls/PrdcrDurbAlphaDEX®ETF
RFFC70.070.24
+0.34%
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF
LQD110.110.05
+0.05%
iShares iBoxx $ Invmt Grade Corp Bd ETF
MSTB40.08-0.33
-0.82%
LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF

AOMFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AOMFF and ALSMY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AOMFF and ALSMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AOMFF
1D Price
Change %
AOMFF100%
N/A
ALSMY - AOMFF
32%
Poorly correlated
+3.19%
CRYCY - AOMFF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDGLY - AOMFF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EJPRF - AOMFF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CJPRY - AOMFF
3%
Poorly correlated
+5.76%
More

CJPRY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CJPRY has been closely correlated with EJPRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CJPRY jumps, then EJPRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CJPRY
1D Price
Change %
CJPRY100%
+5.76%
EJPRY - CJPRY
67%
Closely correlated
-1.40%
WJRYY - CJPRY
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
CNI - CJPRY
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
CP - CJPRY
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.08%
GBX - CJPRY
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.08%
More