AOMFF
Price
$29.50
Change
+$0.48 (+1.65%)
Updated
Dec 22 closing price
Capitalization
13.51B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CDGLY
Price
$20.00
Change
-$4.87 (-19.58%)
Updated
Dec 19 closing price
Capitalization
2.48B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AOMFF vs CDGLY

Header iconAOMFF vs CDGLY Comparison
Open Charts AOMFF vs CDGLYBanner chart's image
Alstom
Price$29.50
Change+$0.48 (+1.65%)
Volume$100
Capitalization13.51B
Comfortdelgro
Price$20.00
Change-$4.87 (-19.58%)
Volume$514
Capitalization2.48B
AOMFF vs CDGLY Comparison Chart in %
AOMFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CDGLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AOMFF vs. CDGLY commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOMFF is a Hold and CDGLY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (AOMFF: $29.50 vs. CDGLY: $20.00)
Brand notoriety: AOMFF and CDGLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Railroads industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AOMFF: 78% vs. CDGLY: 94%
Market capitalization -- AOMFF: $13.51B vs. CDGLY: $2.48B
AOMFF [@Railroads] is valued at $13.51B. CDGLY’s [@Railroads] market capitalization is $2.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Railroads] industry ranges from $139.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Railroads] industry is $17.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AOMFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCDGLY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AOMFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CDGLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AOMFF and CDGLY are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AOMFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CDGLY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AOMFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CDGLY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AOMFF is a better buy in the short-term than CDGLY.

Price Growth

AOMFF (@Railroads) experienced а +3.51% price change this week, while CDGLY (@Railroads) price change was -19.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Railroads industry was +2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Railroads (+2.15% weekly)

The Railroad industry includes passenger and freight transportation services along rail lines. This also includes companies that provide maintenance and switching duties as part of rail services. Within North America, the industry is largely dominated by some large operators. Several short-line railroads serve regional and local routes. Union Pacific Corporation, Canadian National Railway Company, and CSX Corporation are some of the prominent names in the business. The railroad business is relatively cyclical; economic expansion boost the freight services in particular, while economic stagnation often dampens transportation demand.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AOMFF($13.5B) has a higher market cap than CDGLY($2.48B). AOMFF has higher P/E ratio than CDGLY: AOMFF (43.12) vs CDGLY (12.59). AOMFF YTD gains are higher at: 27.155 vs. CDGLY (-11.092). AOMFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.36B vs. CDGLY (772M). AOMFF has higher revenues than CDGLY: AOMFF (18.8B) vs CDGLY (4.78B).
AOMFFCDGLYAOMFF / CDGLY
Capitalization13.5B2.48B545%
EBITDA1.36B772M176%
Gain YTD27.155-11.092-245%
P/E Ratio43.1212.59342%
Revenue18.8B4.78B393%
Total Cash1.69BN/A-
Total Debt3.89BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AOMFF vs CDGLY: Fundamental Ratings
AOMFF
CDGLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9588
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4263
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8484
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CDGLY's Valuation (46) in the null industry is in the same range as AOMFF (63). This means that CDGLY’s stock grew similarly to AOMFF’s over the last 12 months.

CDGLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AOMFF (100). This means that CDGLY’s stock grew similarly to AOMFF’s over the last 12 months.

CDGLY's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as AOMFF (95). This means that CDGLY’s stock grew similarly to AOMFF’s over the last 12 months.

AOMFF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as CDGLY (63). This means that AOMFF’s stock grew similarly to CDGLY’s over the last 12 months.

AOMFF's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as CDGLY (84). This means that AOMFF’s stock grew similarly to CDGLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AOMFFCDGLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AOMFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CDGLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BAMV32.730.19
+0.60%
Brookstone Value Stock ETF
FHLC75.000.36
+0.48%
Fidelity MSCI Health Care ETF
GVAL31.620.13
+0.41%
Cambria Global Value ETF
MOTO53.40N/A
N/A
Guinness Atkinson Smart Trans & Tch ETF
DXYZ30.88-0.98
-3.08%
Destiny Tech100

AOMFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AOMFF and ALSMY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AOMFF and ALSMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AOMFF
1D Price
Change %
AOMFF100%
N/A
ALSMY - AOMFF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
CRYCY - AOMFF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDGLY - AOMFF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EJPRF - AOMFF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CJPRY - AOMFF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.30%
More

CDGLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CDGLY and AOMFF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CDGLY and AOMFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDGLY
1D Price
Change %
CDGLY100%
N/A
AOMFF - CDGLY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EJPRF - CDGLY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRYCY - CDGLY
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CJPRY - CDGLY
-2%
Poorly correlated
+1.30%
ALSMY - CDGLY
-7%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
More