Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AOFIX vs NRGSX
AOFIX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts AOFIX vs NRGSX
Alger Small Cap Focus I
Price$21.29
Change-$0.30 (-1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets884.61M
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$62.80
Change+$0.25 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.71B
AOFIX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AOFIX vs. NRGSX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOFIX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.71B vs. AOFIX (885M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than AOFIX: NRGSX (0.06) vs AOFIX (0.00). AOFIX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: AOFIX (18 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). AOFIX (1.15) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). AOFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.23 vs. NRGSX (13.00). AOFIX (0) and NRGSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. AOFIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.65 vs. NRGSX (-10.12). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -2.32 vs. AOFIX (-26.74).
| AOFIX | NRGSX | AOFIX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.74 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.74 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.136 | -3.902 | -132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 885M | 8.71B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.65 | -10.12 | -105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.27 | 5.90 | 496% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.74 | -2.32 | 1,152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.59 | 10.24 | 923% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement