Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AOFAX vs WCMNX
AOFAX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts AOFAX vs WCMNX
Alger Small Cap Focus A
Price$19.60
Change-$1.01 (-4.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets871.51M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.05
Change-$0.44 (-3.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.88M
AOFAX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AOFAX vs. WCMNX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOFAX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AOFAX has more cash in the bank: 872M vs. WCMNX (41.9M). AOFAX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . AOFAX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: AOFAX (18 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than AOFAX (1.22). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. AOFAX (60.23). AOFAX (1000) and WCMNX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. AOFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.78 vs. WCMNX (-3.16). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 3.45 vs. AOFAX (-26.73).
| AOFAX | WCMNX | AOFAX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.24 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 2.04 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.314 | 6.304 | 84% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 872M | 41.9M | 2,081% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.78 | -3.16 | -56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.53 | 22.08 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.73 | 3.45 | -775% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.22 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement