Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AOFAX vs WCMLX
AOFAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts AOFAX vs WCMLX
Alger Small Cap Focus A
Price$21.01
Change-$0.86 (-3.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets872.81M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.46
Change-$0.18 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.36M
AOFAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AOFAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOFAX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AOFAX has more cash in the bank: 873M vs. WCMLX (47.4M). AOFAX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . AOFAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: AOFAX (18 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than AOFAX (1.22). AOFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.45 vs. WCMLX (83.00). AOFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: AOFAX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). AOFAX (5.95) and WCMLX (5.93) have marching annual gain over last year. WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -7.90 vs. AOFAX (-40.75).
| AOFAX | WCMLX | AOFAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.99 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.79 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.430 | 5.087 | 8% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 873M | 47.4M | 1,842% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.95 | 5.93 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.08 | 18.04 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | -40.75 | -7.90 | 516% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.99 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement