Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AOFAX vs WCMLX
AOFAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts AOFAX vs WCMLX
Alger Small Cap Focus A
Price$21.44
Change-$0.14 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets887.42M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.06
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.58M
AOFAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AOFAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOFAX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AOFAX has more cash in the bank: 887M vs. WCMLX (44.6M). AOFAX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . AOFAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: AOFAX (18 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than AOFAX (1.22). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. AOFAX (60.23). AOFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: AOFAX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.33 vs. AOFAX (6.45). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -4.16 vs. AOFAX (-33.97).
| AOFAX | WCMLX | AOFAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.99 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.79 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.555 | 9.331 | 102% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 887M | 44.6M | 1,989% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.45 | 7.33 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.95 | 33.90 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.97 | -4.16 | 817% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.59 | N/A | - |