Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AOFAX vs WCMLX
AOFAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts AOFAX vs WCMLX
Alger Small Cap Focus A
Price$20.57
Change-$0.28 (-1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets884.61M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.79
Change-$0.04 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.97M
AOFAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AOFAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOFAX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AOFAX has more cash in the bank: 885M vs. WCMLX (43M). AOFAX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . AOFAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: AOFAX (18 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than AOFAX (1.22). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. AOFAX (60.23). AOFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: AOFAX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). AOFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.77 vs. WCMLX (1.70). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 12.48 vs. AOFAX (-27.29).
| AOFAX | WCMLX | AOFAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.99 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.79 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.110 | 7.232 | 71% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 885M | 43M | 2,058% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.77 | 1.70 | 635% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.80 | 33.88 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.29 | 12.48 | -219% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.76 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement