Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AOCIX vs HBLAX
AOCIX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts AOCIX vs HBLAX
American Century One Choice Cnsrv I
Price$14.07
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$15.04
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.81B
AOCIX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AOCIX vs. HBLAX commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOCIX is a Hold and HBLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. AOCIX (1.1B). HBLAX pays higher dividends than AOCIX: HBLAX (3.29) vs AOCIX (2.72). AOCIX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: AOCIX (21 years) vs HBLAX (19 years). HBLAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than AOCIX (0.81). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. AOCIX (9.00). HBLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AOCIX: HBLAX (2000) vs AOCIX (2500). AOCIX IRA initial investment is lower compared to HBLAX: AOCIX (2500) vs HBLAX (2000). AOCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.57 vs. HBLAX (2.20). HBLAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.95 vs. AOCIX (10.95).
| AOCIX | HBLAX | AOCIX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.89 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.89 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.052 | 8.795 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 11.8B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.72 | 3.29 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.57 | 2.20 | 344% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.87 | 24.19 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.95 | 15.95 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.32 | 45.19 | 72% |