AOCIF
Price
$16.24
Change
-$0.79 (-4.64%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Capitalization
372.43M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VRM
Price
$21.00
Change
-$1.23 (-5.53%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:05 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
115.59M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AOCIF vs VRM

Header iconAOCIF vs VRM Comparison
Open Charts AOCIF vs VRMBanner chart's image
Autocanada
Price$16.24
Change-$0.79 (-4.64%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization372.43M
Vroom
Price$21.00
Change-$1.23 (-5.53%)
Volume$274
Capitalization115.59M
AOCIF vs VRM Comparison Chart in %
AOCIF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VRM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AOCIF vs. VRM commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOCIF is a Hold and VRM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (AOCIF: $16.24 vs. VRM: $22.23)
Brand notoriety: AOCIF and VRM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AOCIF: 129% vs. VRM: 72%
Market capitalization -- AOCIF: $363.51M vs. VRM: $109.92M
AOCIF [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $363.51M. VRM’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $109.92M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $45.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $3.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AOCIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVRM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AOCIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AOCIF is a better buy in the long-term than VRM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AOCIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VRM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AOCIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • VRM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AOCIF is a better buy in the short-term than VRM.

Price Growth

AOCIF (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а -10.23% price change this week, while VRM (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was -9.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -0.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.08%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (-0.45% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AOCIF($372M) has a higher market cap than VRM($116M). VRM YTD gains are higher at: 343.713 vs. AOCIF (36.816). AOCIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 190M vs. VRM (-15.09M). AOCIF has more cash in the bank: 62.4M vs. VRM (14.3M). VRM has less debt than AOCIF: VRM (779M) vs AOCIF (1.8B). AOCIF has higher revenues than VRM: AOCIF (5.34B) vs VRM (11.6M).
AOCIFVRMAOCIF / VRM
Capitalization372M116M321%
EBITDA190M-15.09M-1,259%
Gain YTD36.816343.71311%
P/E Ratio10.90N/A-
Revenue5.34B11.6M46,009%
Total Cash62.4M14.3M436%
Total Debt1.8B779M232%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AOCIF: Fundamental Ratings
AOCIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
24
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
89
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AOCIFVRM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AOCIF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VRM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYDCX108.960.55
+0.51%
Rydex Mid-Cap 1.5x Strategy C
LAFFX21.100.09
+0.43%
Lord Abbett Affiliated A
IGHSX11.910.05
+0.42%
Voya Global High Dividend Low Vol Port S
MSGSX17.14-0.02
-0.12%
MassMutual Small Cap Gr Eq R5
OMSNX30.10-0.05
-0.17%
Invesco Main Street All Cap R

AOCIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AOCIF and BWTL have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AOCIF and BWTL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AOCIF
1D Price
Change %
AOCIF100%
-4.64%
BWTL - AOCIF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LEFUF - AOCIF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.36%
HPCRF - AOCIF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDNAF - AOCIF
17%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
VRM - AOCIF
14%
Poorly correlated
-4.59%
More

VRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRM has been loosely correlated with HNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VRM jumps, then HNST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRM
1D Price
Change %
VRM100%
-4.59%
HNST - VRM
41%
Loosely correlated
+8.73%
CPRT - VRM
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
CVNA - VRM
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
LE - VRM
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
BBBY - VRM
27%
Poorly correlated
-5.32%
More