AOCIF
Price
$12.79
Change
+$0.93 (+7.84%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
ODP
Price
$25.37
Change
+$0.45 (+1.81%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
103 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AOCIF vs ODP

Header iconAOCIF vs ODP Comparison
Open Charts AOCIF vs ODPBanner chart's image
Autocanada
Price$12.79
Change+$0.93 (+7.84%)
Volume$7.55K
CapitalizationN/A
ODP Corp (The)
Price$25.37
Change+$0.45 (+1.81%)
Volume$476.67K
CapitalizationN/A
AOCIF vs ODP Comparison Chart
Loading...
ODP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AOCIF vs. ODP commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOCIF is a Hold and ODP is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (AOCIF: $12.79 vs. ODP: $25.37)
Brand notoriety: AOCIF and ODP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AOCIF: 466% vs. ODP: 85%
Market capitalization -- AOCIF: $462.54M vs. ODP: $1.94B
AOCIF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $462.54M. ODP’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $1.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AOCIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileODP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AOCIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ODP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AOCIF is a better buy in the long-term than ODP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ODP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ODP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

AOCIF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +7.84% price change this week, while ODP (@Specialty Stores) price change was -8.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

ODP is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-2.09% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ODP($1.94B) has a higher market cap than AOCIF($463M). ODP has higher P/E ratio than AOCIF: ODP (14.99) vs AOCIF (11.74). AOCIF YTD gains are higher at: -18.275 vs. ODP (-54.938). ODP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 335M vs. AOCIF (217M). ODP has more cash in the bank: 392M vs. AOCIF (103M). ODP has less debt than AOCIF: ODP (963M) vs AOCIF (2.24B). ODP has higher revenues than AOCIF: ODP (7.83B) vs AOCIF (6.44B).
AOCIFODPAOCIF / ODP
Capitalization463M1.94B24%
EBITDA217M335M65%
Gain YTD-18.275-54.93833%
P/E Ratio11.7414.9978%
Revenue6.44B7.83B82%
Total Cash103M392M26%
Total Debt2.24B963M232%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AOCIF vs ODP: Fundamental Ratings
AOCIF
ODP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4862
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8278
SMR RATING
1..100
7065
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6087
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
206
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AOCIF's Valuation (55) in the null industry is in the same range as ODP (71) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that AOCIF’s stock grew similarly to ODP’s over the last 12 months.

ODP's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as AOCIF (82) in the null industry. This means that ODP’s stock grew similarly to AOCIF’s over the last 12 months.

ODP's SMR Rating (65) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as AOCIF (70) in the null industry. This means that ODP’s stock grew similarly to AOCIF’s over the last 12 months.

AOCIF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as ODP (87) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that AOCIF’s stock grew similarly to ODP’s over the last 12 months.

ODP's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as AOCIF (20) in the null industry. This means that ODP’s stock grew similarly to AOCIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ODP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
0%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ODP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

AOCIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AOCIF has been loosely correlated with ODP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AOCIF jumps, then ODP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AOCIF
1D Price
Change %
AOCIF100%
+7.84%
ODP - AOCIF
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.81%
BWTL - AOCIF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
LEFUF - AOCIF
29%
Poorly correlated
-3.77%
HPCRF - AOCIF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EYE - AOCIF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
More

ODP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ODP has been loosely correlated with EYE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ODP jumps, then EYE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ODP
1D Price
Change %
ODP100%
+1.81%
EYE - ODP
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.08%
BWTL - ODP
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
AOCIF - ODP
41%
Loosely correlated
+7.84%
LESL - ODP
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.83%
PAG - ODP
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
More