AOCIF
Price
$13.29
Change
-$0.05 (-0.37%)
Updated
Nov 27 closing price
EYE
Price
$11.25
Change
-$0.15 (-1.32%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
70 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AOCIF vs EYE

Header iconAOCIF vs EYE Comparison
Open Charts AOCIF vs EYEBanner chart's image
Autocanada
Price$13.29
Change-$0.05 (-0.37%)
Volume$700
CapitalizationN/A
National Vision Holdings
Price$11.25
Change-$0.15 (-1.32%)
Volume$29.03K
CapitalizationN/A
AOCIF vs EYE Comparison Chart
Loading...
EYE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AOCIF vs. EYE commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOCIF is a Hold and EYE is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (AOCIF: $13.29 vs. EYE: $11.40)
Brand notoriety: AOCIF and EYE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AOCIF: 56% vs. EYE: 71%
Market capitalization -- AOCIF: $462.54M vs. EYE: $1.74B
AOCIF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $462.54M. EYE’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $1.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AOCIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEYE’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AOCIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EYE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AOCIF and EYE are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EYE’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • EYE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

AOCIF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while EYE (@Specialty Stores) price change was -5.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -5.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

EYE is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-5.35% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EYE($1.74B) has a higher market cap than AOCIF($463M). EYE has higher P/E ratio than AOCIF: EYE (51.02) vs AOCIF (11.74). AOCIF YTD gains are higher at: -15.080 vs. EYE (-45.533). AOCIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 217M vs. EYE (54M). EYE has more cash in the bank: 150M vs. AOCIF (103M). EYE has less debt than AOCIF: EYE (923M) vs AOCIF (2.24B). AOCIF has higher revenues than EYE: AOCIF (6.44B) vs EYE (2.13B).
AOCIFEYEAOCIF / EYE
Capitalization463M1.74B27%
EBITDA217M54M402%
Gain YTD-15.080-45.53333%
P/E Ratio11.7451.0223%
Revenue6.44B2.13B303%
Total Cash103M150M69%
Total Debt2.24B923M242%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AOCIF vs EYE: Fundamental Ratings
AOCIF
EYE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9764
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
81100
SMR RATING
1..100
6992
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5460
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1423
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AOCIF's Valuation (54) in the null industry is in the same range as EYE (66) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that AOCIF’s stock grew similarly to EYE’s over the last 12 months.

AOCIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as EYE (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that AOCIF’s stock grew similarly to EYE’s over the last 12 months.

AOCIF's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as EYE (92) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that AOCIF’s stock grew similarly to EYE’s over the last 12 months.

AOCIF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as EYE (60) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that AOCIF’s stock grew similarly to EYE’s over the last 12 months.

AOCIF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as EYE (23) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that AOCIF’s stock grew similarly to EYE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EYE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EYE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

AOCIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AOCIF has been loosely correlated with ODP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AOCIF jumps, then ODP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AOCIF
1D Price
Change %
AOCIF100%
N/A
ODP - AOCIF
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
BWTL - AOCIF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LEFUF - AOCIF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HPCRF - AOCIF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EYE - AOCIF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.55%
More

EYE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EYE has been loosely correlated with ODP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EYE jumps, then ODP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EYE
1D Price
Change %
EYE100%
-1.55%
ODP - EYE
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
HD - EYE
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
PAG - EYE
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.44%
CWH - EYE
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
LAD - EYE
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.68%
More