AOCIF
Price
$24.48
Change
-$0.51 (-2.04%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
560.2M
CDNAF
Price
$121.94
Change
+$1.19 (+0.99%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.82B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AOCIF vs CDNAF

Header iconAOCIF vs CDNAF Comparison
Open Charts AOCIF vs CDNAFBanner chart's image
Autocanada
Price$24.48
Change-$0.51 (-2.04%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization560.2M
Canadian Tire
Price$121.94
Change+$1.19 (+0.99%)
Volume$72.32K
Capitalization6.82B
AOCIF vs CDNAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AOCIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CDNAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AOCIF vs. CDNAF commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOCIF is a Hold and CDNAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (AOCIF: $24.48 vs. CDNAF: $121.94)
Brand notoriety: AOCIF and CDNAF are both not notable
AOCIF represents the Automotive Aftermarket, while CDNAF is part of the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AOCIF: 157% vs. CDNAF: 501%
Market capitalization -- AOCIF: $560.2M vs. CDNAF: $6.82B
AOCIF [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $560.2M. CDNAF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $6.82B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $50.03B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $50.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $4.21B. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AOCIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCDNAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AOCIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CDNAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AOCIF is a better buy in the long-term than CDNAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AOCIF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CDNAF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AOCIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CDNAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AOCIF is a better buy in the short-term than CDNAF.

Price Growth

AOCIF (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а -2.05% price change this week, while CDNAF (@Specialty Stores) price change was -2.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -1.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.94%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (-1.20% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

@Specialty Stores (-1.68% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDNAF($6.82B) has a higher market cap than AOCIF($560M). AOCIF has higher P/E ratio than CDNAF: AOCIF (16.10) vs CDNAF (11.44). AOCIF YTD gains are higher at: 106.217 vs. CDNAF (16.244). CDNAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.03B vs. AOCIF (190M). CDNAF has more cash in the bank: 1.19B vs. AOCIF (62.4M). AOCIF has less debt than CDNAF: AOCIF (1.8B) vs CDNAF (7.62B). CDNAF has higher revenues than AOCIF: CDNAF (16.7B) vs AOCIF (5.34B).
AOCIFCDNAFAOCIF / CDNAF
Capitalization560M6.82B8%
EBITDA190M2.03B9%
Gain YTD106.21716.244654%
P/E Ratio16.1011.44141%
Revenue5.34B16.7B32%
Total Cash62.4M1.19B5%
Total Debt1.8B7.62B24%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AOCIF vs CDNAF: Fundamental Ratings
AOCIF
CDNAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9082
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6870
SMR RATING
1..100
9359
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3660
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1793
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CDNAF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AOCIF (70). This means that CDNAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AOCIF’s over the last 12 months.

AOCIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNAF (70). This means that AOCIF’s stock grew similarly to CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

CDNAF's SMR Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AOCIF (93). This means that CDNAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AOCIF’s over the last 12 months.

AOCIF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNAF (60). This means that AOCIF’s stock grew similarly to CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

AOCIF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CDNAF (93). This means that AOCIF’s stock grew significantly faster than CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AOCIFCDNAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AOCIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CDNAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STCAX17.270.14
+0.82%
Virtus Silvant Large-Cap Growth Stk I
SPFFX30.440.23
+0.76%
Sphere 500 Climate Fund
PLSAX31.240.15
+0.48%
Principal Large Cap S&P 500 Index A
APHRX35.560.13
+0.37%
Artisan Global Opportunities Instl
BFTHX62.460.13
+0.21%
Baron Fifth Avenue Growth Retail

AOCIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AOCIF has been loosely correlated with ODP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AOCIF jumps, then ODP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AOCIF
1D Price
Change %
AOCIF100%
N/A
ODP - AOCIF
41%
Loosely correlated
+2.92%
BWTL - AOCIF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
LEFUF - AOCIF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
HPCRF - AOCIF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
EYE - AOCIF
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.87%
More

CDNAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNAF has been loosely correlated with DUFRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDNAF jumps, then DUFRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNAF
1D Price
Change %
CDNAF100%
+0.99%
DUFRY - CDNAF
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
LEFUF - CDNAF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
ANCTF - CDNAF
17%
Poorly correlated
+5.71%
AOCIF - CDNAF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BWTL - CDNAF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
More