ANZLY
Price
$1.65
Change
+$0.18 (+12.24%)
Updated
Dec 2 closing price
Capitalization
2.24B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BABWF
Price
$4.85
Change
+$0.15 (+3.19%)
Updated
Dec 1 closing price
Capitalization
23.5B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ANZLY vs BABWF

Header iconANZLY vs BABWF Comparison
Open Charts ANZLY vs BABWFBanner chart's image
Air New Zealand
Price$1.65
Change+$0.18 (+12.24%)
Volume$667
Capitalization2.24B
International Consolidated Airlines Group SA
Price$4.85
Change+$0.15 (+3.19%)
Volume$126
Capitalization23.5B
ANZLY vs BABWF Comparison Chart in %
ANZLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BABWF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ANZLY vs. BABWF commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANZLY is a Hold and BABWF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (ANZLY: $1.47 vs. BABWF: $4.85)
Brand notoriety: ANZLY and BABWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Airlines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ANZLY: 190% vs. BABWF: 2%
Market capitalization -- ANZLY: $2.24B vs. BABWF: $23.5B
ANZLY [@Airlines] is valued at $2.24B. BABWF’s [@Airlines] market capitalization is $23.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Airlines] industry ranges from $44.07B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Airlines] industry is $8.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ANZLY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBABWF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ANZLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BABWF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, BABWF is a better buy in the long-term than ANZLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ANZLY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BABWF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ANZLY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • BABWF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BABWF is a better buy in the short-term than ANZLY.

Price Growth

ANZLY (@Airlines) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BABWF (@Airlines) price change was +3.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Airlines industry was +1.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.56%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Airlines (+1.04% weekly)

Airlines industry comprises passenger air transportation, including scheduled and non-scheduled routes. This can include charter airlines, as well as regular commuter ones. Discount pricing and the rise of low-cost carriers over recent decades have expanded the industry by making its services accessible to a much larger global population, compared to the older days when airline travel was a relative luxury for many people in the world. Delta Air Lines Inc., Southwest Airlines Co and United Continental Holdings, Inc. are some of the airlines with the largest stock market capitalizations in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BABWF($23.5B) has a higher market cap than ANZLY($2.24B). ANZLY has higher P/E ratio than BABWF: ANZLY (15.54) vs BABWF (6.47). BABWF YTD gains are higher at: 33.978 vs. ANZLY (-4.996). BABWF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.6B vs. ANZLY (1.07B). BABWF has higher revenues than ANZLY: BABWF (33.3B) vs ANZLY (6.76B).
ANZLYBABWFANZLY / BABWF
Capitalization2.24B23.5B10%
EBITDA1.07B7.6B14%
Gain YTD-4.99633.978-15%
P/E Ratio15.546.47240%
Revenue6.76B33.3B20%
Total CashN/A9.35B-
Total DebtN/A14.8B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ANZLY vs BABWF: Fundamental Ratings
ANZLY
BABWF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10027
SMR RATING
1..100
9018
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7658
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3331
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ANZLY's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BABWF (55). This means that ANZLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BABWF’s over the last 12 months.

BABWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ANZLY (100). This means that BABWF’s stock grew significantly faster than ANZLY’s over the last 12 months.

BABWF's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ANZLY (90). This means that BABWF’s stock grew significantly faster than ANZLY’s over the last 12 months.

BABWF's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as ANZLY (76). This means that BABWF’s stock grew similarly to ANZLY’s over the last 12 months.

BABWF's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as ANZLY (33). This means that BABWF’s stock grew similarly to ANZLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ANZLYBABWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ANZLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BABWF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IGICX45.98N/A
N/A
American Funds Intl Gr and Inc C
OSMNX38.77N/A
N/A
Invesco International Small-Mid Com R
BIBDX13.51N/A
N/A
BlackRock Global Dividend Instl
WWSIX24.96N/A
N/A
Keeley Small Cap Fund Institutional
BRSDX15.49N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq A

ANZLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ANZLY and AIABF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ANZLY and AIABF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ANZLY
1D Price
Change %
ANZLY100%
N/A
AIABF - ANZLY
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIRYY - ANZLY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BABWF - ANZLY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AFRAF - ANZLY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CEBUY - ANZLY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BABWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BABWF and ICAGY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BABWF and ICAGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BABWF
1D Price
Change %
BABWF100%
N/A
ICAGY - BABWF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WZZZY - BABWF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DAL - BABWF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.57%
JAPSY - BABWF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DLAKY - BABWF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More