ANZGF
Price
$19.36
Change
-$0.84 (-4.16%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
51.7B
WEBNF
Price
$21.30
Change
+$1.55 (+7.85%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
52.34B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ANZGF vs WEBNF

Header iconANZGF vs WEBNF Comparison
Open Charts ANZGF vs WEBNFBanner chart's image
ANZ GROUP
Price$19.36
Change-$0.84 (-4.16%)
Volume$420
Capitalization51.7B
Westpac Banking
Price$21.30
Change+$1.55 (+7.85%)
Volume$1.29K
Capitalization52.34B
ANZGF vs WEBNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ANZGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WEBNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ANZGF vs. WEBNF commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANZGF is a StrongBuy and WEBNF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (ANZGF: $19.36 vs. WEBNF: $21.30)
Brand notoriety: ANZGF and WEBNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ANZGF: 13% vs. WEBNF: 38%
Market capitalization -- ANZGF: $51.7B vs. WEBNF: $52.34B
ANZGF [@Major Banks] is valued at $51.7B. WEBNF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $52.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ANZGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWEBNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ANZGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WEBNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ANZGF is a better buy in the long-term than WEBNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ANZGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WEBNF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ANZGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WEBNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ANZGF is a better buy in the short-term than WEBNF.

Price Growth

ANZGF (@Major Banks) experienced а -4.16% price change this week, while WEBNF (@Major Banks) price change was -3.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.77%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.63% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WEBNF($52.3B) and ANZGF($51.7B) have the same market capitalization . WEBNF has higher P/E ratio than ANZGF: WEBNF (12.44) vs ANZGF (10.71). WEBNF YTD gains are higher at: 14.516 vs. ANZGF (8.449). ANZGF has less debt than WEBNF: ANZGF (145B) vs WEBNF (180B). WEBNF has higher revenues than ANZGF: WEBNF (21.2B) vs ANZGF (19.8B).
ANZGFWEBNFANZGF / WEBNF
Capitalization51.7B52.3B99%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.44914.51658%
P/E Ratio10.7112.4486%
Revenue19.8B21.2B93%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt145B180B81%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ANZGF vs WEBNF: Fundamental Ratings
ANZGF
WEBNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5042
SMR RATING
1..100
33
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5155
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4644
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a36

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ANZGF's Valuation (63) in the null industry is in the same range as WEBNF (87). This means that ANZGF’s stock grew similarly to WEBNF’s over the last 12 months.

WEBNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as ANZGF (50). This means that WEBNF’s stock grew similarly to ANZGF’s over the last 12 months.

WEBNF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as ANZGF (3). This means that WEBNF’s stock grew similarly to ANZGF’s over the last 12 months.

ANZGF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as WEBNF (55). This means that ANZGF’s stock grew similarly to WEBNF’s over the last 12 months.

WEBNF's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as ANZGF (46). This means that WEBNF’s stock grew similarly to ANZGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ANZGFWEBNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
43%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ANZGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WEBNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RCUS10.230.36
+3.65%
Arcus Biosciences
TGEN8.500.15
+1.80%
Tecogen Inc
BIPC41.730.08
+0.19%
Brookfield Infrastructure Corp
NU12.73-0.02
-0.16%
Nu Holdings Ltd
SLND4.35-0.06
-1.36%
Southland Holdings

ANZGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ANZGF and INGVF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ANZGF and INGVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ANZGF
1D Price
Change %
ANZGF100%
-4.16%
INGVF - ANZGF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVNLF - ANZGF
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.62%
ANZGY - ANZGF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
SVNLY - ANZGF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.81%
WEBNF - ANZGF
7%
Poorly correlated
+7.85%
More

WEBNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WEBNF and CMWAY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WEBNF and CMWAY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WEBNF
1D Price
Change %
WEBNF100%
+7.85%
CMWAY - WEBNF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
ANZGY - WEBNF
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
SMFNF - WEBNF
17%
Poorly correlated
+2.18%
CABPF - WEBNF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANZGF - WEBNF
7%
Poorly correlated
-4.16%
More