ANZGF
Price
$24.40
Change
+$0.57 (+2.39%)
Updated
Dec 22 closing price
Capitalization
72.58B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SVNLY
Price
$7.26
Change
-$0.04 (-0.55%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
29.17B
38 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ANZGF vs SVNLY

Header iconANZGF vs SVNLY Comparison
Open Charts ANZGF vs SVNLYBanner chart's image
ANZ GROUP
Price$24.40
Change+$0.57 (+2.39%)
Volume$335
Capitalization72.58B
Svenska Handelsbanken AB PUBL
Price$7.26
Change-$0.04 (-0.55%)
Volume$76.56K
Capitalization29.17B
ANZGF vs SVNLY Comparison Chart in %
ANZGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SVNLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ANZGF vs. SVNLY commentary
Dec 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANZGF is a Buy and SVNLY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 28, 2025
Stock price -- (ANZGF: $24.40 vs. SVNLY: $7.26)
Brand notoriety: ANZGF and SVNLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ANZGF: 68% vs. SVNLY: 57%
Market capitalization -- ANZGF: $72.58B vs. SVNLY: $29.17B
ANZGF [@Major Banks] is valued at $72.58B. SVNLY’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $29.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $892.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $145.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ANZGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSVNLY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ANZGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SVNLY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ANZGF and SVNLY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ANZGF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVNLY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ANZGF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SVNLY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SVNLY is a better buy in the short-term than ANZGF.

Price Growth

ANZGF (@Major Banks) experienced а +2.40% price change this week, while SVNLY (@Major Banks) price change was +2.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

SVNLY is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.32% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANZGF($72.6B) has a higher market cap than SVNLY($29.2B). ANZGF has higher P/E ratio than SVNLY: ANZGF (18.53) vs SVNLY (10.51). SVNLY YTD gains are higher at: 83.398 vs. ANZGF (36.668). ANZGF has less debt than SVNLY: ANZGF (220B) vs SVNLY (1.53T). SVNLY has higher revenues than ANZGF: SVNLY (58.7B) vs ANZGF (22.3B).
ANZGFSVNLYANZGF / SVNLY
Capitalization72.6B29.2B249%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD36.66883.39844%
P/E Ratio18.5310.51176%
Revenue22.3B58.7B38%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt220B1.53T14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ANZGF vs SVNLY: Fundamental Ratings
ANZGF
SVNLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4718
SMR RATING
1..100
42
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4142
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1622
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ANZGF's Valuation (67) in the null industry is in the same range as SVNLY (97). This means that ANZGF’s stock grew similarly to SVNLY’s over the last 12 months.

SVNLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as ANZGF (47). This means that SVNLY’s stock grew similarly to ANZGF’s over the last 12 months.

SVNLY's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as ANZGF (4). This means that SVNLY’s stock grew similarly to ANZGF’s over the last 12 months.

ANZGF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as SVNLY (42). This means that ANZGF’s stock grew similarly to SVNLY’s over the last 12 months.

ANZGF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as SVNLY (22). This means that ANZGF’s stock grew similarly to SVNLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ANZGFSVNLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ANZGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SVNLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TACHU10.35N/A
N/A
Titan Acquisition Corp
CR187.80-0.47
-0.25%
Crane Company
NRIX19.30-0.06
-0.31%
Nurix Therapeutics
RIBB10.37-0.04
-0.37%
Ribbon Acquisition Corp
EAF16.25-0.47
-2.81%
GrafTech International Ltd

ANZGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ANZGF and INGVF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ANZGF and INGVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ANZGF
1D Price
Change %
ANZGF100%
N/A
INGVF - ANZGF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANZGY - ANZGF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
SVNLY - ANZGF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
SVNLF - ANZGF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.87%
SCBFY - ANZGF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
More

SVNLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SVNLY has been loosely correlated with SVNLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SVNLY jumps, then SVNLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVNLY
1D Price
Change %
SVNLY100%
-0.49%
SVNLF - SVNLY
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.87%
RY - SVNLY
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
ING - SVNLY
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
NABZY - SVNLY
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
SCBFY - SVNLY
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
More