ANZGF
Price
$22.84
Change
-$1.16 (-4.83%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
68.11B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SCBFY
Price
$45.36
Change
+$0.64 (+1.43%)
Updated
Dec 2 closing price
Capitalization
50.34B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ANZGF vs SCBFY

Header iconANZGF vs SCBFY Comparison
Open Charts ANZGF vs SCBFYBanner chart's image
ANZ GROUP
Price$22.84
Change-$1.16 (-4.83%)
Volume$600
Capitalization68.11B
Standard Chartered
Price$45.36
Change+$0.64 (+1.43%)
Volume$270.02K
Capitalization50.34B
ANZGF vs SCBFY Comparison Chart in %
ANZGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SCBFY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ANZGF vs. SCBFY commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANZGF is a Buy and SCBFY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (ANZGF: $24.00 vs. SCBFY: $44.72)
Brand notoriety: ANZGF and SCBFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ANZGF: 167% vs. SCBFY: 740%
Market capitalization -- ANZGF: $66.85B vs. SCBFY: $50.34B
ANZGF [@Major Banks] is valued at $66.85B. SCBFY’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $50.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $840.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $140.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ANZGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSCBFY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ANZGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SCBFY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ANZGF and SCBFY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ANZGF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCBFY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ANZGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SCBFY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ANZGF is a better buy in the short-term than SCBFY.

Price Growth

ANZGF (@Major Banks) experienced а +10.76% price change this week, while SCBFY (@Major Banks) price change was +4.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

SCBFY is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.27% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANZGF($68.1B) has a higher market cap than SCBFY($50.3B). ANZGF has higher P/E ratio than SCBFY: ANZGF (17.69) vs SCBFY (11.80). SCBFY YTD gains are higher at: 83.761 vs. ANZGF (34.441). SCBFY has less debt than ANZGF: SCBFY (99.4B) vs ANZGF (232B). ANZGF (21.4B) and SCBFY (20.5B) have equivalent revenues.
ANZGFSCBFYANZGF / SCBFY
Capitalization68.1B50.3B135%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD34.44183.76141%
P/E Ratio17.6911.80150%
Revenue21.4B20.5B104%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt232B99.4B233%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ANZGF vs SCBFY: Fundamental Ratings
ANZGF
SCBFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
355
SMR RATING
1..100
46
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4339
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2014
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ANZGF's Valuation (64) in the null industry is in the same range as SCBFY (64). This means that ANZGF’s stock grew similarly to SCBFY’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as ANZGF (35). This means that SCBFY’s stock grew similarly to ANZGF’s over the last 12 months.

ANZGF's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as SCBFY (6). This means that ANZGF’s stock grew similarly to SCBFY’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as ANZGF (43). This means that SCBFY’s stock grew similarly to ANZGF’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFY's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as ANZGF (20). This means that SCBFY’s stock grew similarly to ANZGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ANZGFSCBFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ANZGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SCBFY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CECO52.320.40
+0.77%
CECO Environmental Corp
FRBA15.780.03
+0.19%
First Bank
RANGU11.00N/A
N/A
Range Capital Acquisition Corp
SEIC79.96-0.02
-0.03%
SEI Investments Company
STKS1.90-0.11
-5.47%
ONE Group Hospitality (The)

ANZGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ANZGF and INGVF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ANZGF and INGVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ANZGF
1D Price
Change %
ANZGF100%
N/A
INGVF - ANZGF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANZGY - ANZGF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVNLY - ANZGF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVNLF - ANZGF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCBFY - ANZGF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SCBFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCBFY has been loosely correlated with HSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCBFY jumps, then HSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCBFY
1D Price
Change %
SCBFY100%
N/A
HSBC - SCBFY
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
BCS - SCBFY
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
ING - SCBFY
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
SAN - SCBFY
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.71%
SCBFF - SCBFY
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More