It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FTFT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ANY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTFT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
FTFT (@Packaged Software) experienced а +20.03% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.91%.
FTFT is expected to report earnings on Apr 04, 2023.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
ANY | FTFT | ANY / FTFT | |
Capitalization | 25.8M | 19.7M | 131% |
EBITDA | -15.94M | -11.58M | 138% |
Gain YTD | -53.614 | -78.880 | 68% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 21.9M | 32M | 68% |
Total Cash | 586K | 33.7M | 2% |
Total Debt | 1.05M | 1.5M | 70% |
ANY | FTFT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 69 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 49 Fair valued | 99 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ANY's Valuation (49) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTFT (99) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that ANY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTFT’s over the last 12 months.
ANY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FTFT (100) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that ANY’s stock grew similarly to FTFT’s over the last 12 months.
FTFT's SMR Rating (94) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as ANY (98) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FTFT’s stock grew similarly to ANY’s over the last 12 months.
ANY's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FTFT (42) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that ANY’s stock grew similarly to FTFT’s over the last 12 months.
FTFT's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is significantly better than the same rating for ANY (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FTFT’s stock grew significantly faster than ANY’s over the last 12 months.
ANY | FTFT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago82% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago86% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago78% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago84% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago87% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago88% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago89% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ANY has been loosely correlated with DGHI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ANY jumps, then DGHI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ANY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ANY | 100% | -12.00% | ||
DGHI - ANY | 48% Loosely correlated | -6.93% | ||
MSTR - ANY | 42% Loosely correlated | -7.91% | ||
FTFT - ANY | 38% Loosely correlated | -14.11% | ||
BTDR - ANY | 36% Loosely correlated | -3.37% | ||
BKKT - ANY | 34% Loosely correlated | -6.41% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTFT has been loosely correlated with BTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTFT jumps, then BTDR could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FTFT | 100% | -14.11% | ||
BTDR - FTFT | 42% Loosely correlated | -3.37% | ||
ANY - FTFT | 37% Loosely correlated | -12.00% | ||
DGHI - FTFT | 34% Loosely correlated | -6.93% | ||
MSTR - FTFT | 33% Loosely correlated | -7.91% | ||
SQ - FTFT | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.64% | ||
More |