Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs RGPAX
ANWPX vs RGPAX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs RGPAX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$73.97
Change+$0.14 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.86B
RBC Global Opportunities A
Price$23.60
Change+$0.03 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets486.75M
ANWPX vs RGPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. RGPAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Hold and RGPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. RGPAX (487M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than RGPAX: ANWPX (0.48) vs RGPAX (0.35). ANWPX was incepted earlier than RGPAX: ANWPX (53 years) vs RGPAX (6 years). RGPAX (8.20) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). RGPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. ANWPX (24.00). ANWPX (6%) and RGPAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGPAX: ANWPX (250) vs RGPAX (1000). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.82 vs. RGPAX (11.55). RGPAX (36.98) and ANWPX (35.42) have equivalent 5 years return.
| ANWPX | RGPAX | ANWPX / RGPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.00 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 8.20 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.095 | 14.065 | 136% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 487M | 33,470% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.35 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.82 | 11.55 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.71 | 54.43 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.42 | 36.98 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.22 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement