Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs HLMGX
ANWPX vs HLMGX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs HLMGX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$71.21
Change+$0.05 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.35B
Harding Loevner Global Equity Advisor
Price$36.96
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets579.67M
ANWPX vs HLMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. HLMGX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and HLMGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. HLMGX (580M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than HLMGX: ANWPX (0.51) vs HLMGX (0.15). ANWPX was incepted earlier than HLMGX: ANWPX (52 years) vs HLMGX (29 years). HLMGX (1.08) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). HLMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. ANWPX (24.00). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMGX: ANWPX (250) vs HLMGX (5000). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.07 vs. HLMGX (-11.44). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 42.99 vs. HLMGX (-11.03).
| ANWPX | HLMGX | ANWPX / HLMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.08 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.08 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.651 | 9.804 | 149% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 580M | 27,241% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.15 | 348% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.07 | -11.44 | -149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.17 | 13.97 | 323% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.99 | -11.03 | -390% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.23 | 13.97 | 624% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement