Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs HLMGX
ANWPX vs HLMGX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs HLMGX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$74.62
Change+$0.38 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.64B
Harding Loevner Global Equity Advisor
Price$37.71
Change+$0.09 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets578.5M
ANWPX vs HLMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. HLMGX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and HLMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. HLMGX (579M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than HLMGX: ANWPX (0.47) vs HLMGX (0.14). ANWPX was incepted earlier than HLMGX: ANWPX (53 years) vs HLMGX (29 years). HLMGX (1.08) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). HLMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. ANWPX (24.00). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMGX: ANWPX (250) vs HLMGX (5000). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.61 vs. HLMGX (-16.32). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 25.01 vs. HLMGX (-20.69).
| ANWPX | HLMGX | ANWPX / HLMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.08 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.08 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.192 | 11.378 | 169% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 579M | 28,152% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.14 | 337% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.61 | -16.32 | -71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.28 | 11.75 | 377% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.01 | -20.69 | -121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.95 | 16.25 | 572% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement