Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs HLGZX
ANWPX vs HLGZX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs HLGZX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$71.68
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.96B
Harding Loevner Global Equity Instl Z
Price$36.86
Change+$0.09 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets573.28M
ANWPX vs HLGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. HLGZX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a StrongBuy and HLGZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. HLGZX (573M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than HLGZX: ANWPX (0.50) vs HLGZX (0.46). ANWPX was incepted earlier than HLGZX: ANWPX (52 years) vs HLGZX (8 years). HLGZX (0.77) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). HLGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. ANWPX (24.00). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLGZX: ANWPX (250) vs HLGZX (10000000). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.69 vs. HLGZX (-13.92). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 38.60 vs. HLGZX (-13.43).
| ANWPX | HLGZX | ANWPX / HLGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.76 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.77 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.408 | 8.700 | 177% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 10000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159B | 573M | 27,749% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.46 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.69 | -13.92 | -98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.68 | 3.38 | 1,025% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.60 | -13.43 | -287% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers