Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs HLGZX
ANWPX vs HLGZX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs HLGZX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$71.21
Change+$0.05 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.35B
Harding Loevner Global Equity Instl Z
Price$37.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets579.67M
ANWPX vs HLGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. HLGZX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and HLGZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. HLGZX (580M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than HLGZX: ANWPX (0.51) vs HLGZX (0.46). ANWPX was incepted earlier than HLGZX: ANWPX (52 years) vs HLGZX (8 years). HLGZX (0.77) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). HLGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. ANWPX (24.00). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLGZX: ANWPX (250) vs HLGZX (10000000). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.07 vs. HLGZX (-10.99). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 42.99 vs. HLGZX (-9.52).
| ANWPX | HLGZX | ANWPX / HLGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.76 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.77 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.651 | 9.997 | 147% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 10000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 580M | 27,241% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.46 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.07 | -10.99 | -155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.17 | 15.25 | 296% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.99 | -9.52 | -452% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.23 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement