Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs HLGZX
ANWPX vs HLGZX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs HLGZX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$74.06
Change-$1.23 (-1.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.22B
Harding Loevner Global Equity Instl Z
Price$37.75
Change-$0.50 (-1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets576.92M
ANWPX vs HLGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. HLGZX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and HLGZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. HLGZX (577M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than HLGZX: ANWPX (0.47) vs HLGZX (0.45). ANWPX was incepted earlier than HLGZX: ANWPX (53 years) vs HLGZX (8 years). HLGZX (0.77) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). HLGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. ANWPX (24.00). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLGZX: ANWPX (250) vs HLGZX (10000000). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.70 vs. HLGZX (-14.38). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 34.21 vs. HLGZX (-16.11).
| ANWPX | HLGZX | ANWPX / HLGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.76 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.77 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.220 | 12.799 | 166% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 10000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 165B | 577M | 28,596% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.45 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.70 | -14.38 | -102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.03 | 15.88 | 321% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.21 | -16.11 | -212% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.03 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement