Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs FWAFX
ANWPX vs FWAFX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs FWAFX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$74.77
Change+$0.80 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.86B
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
Price$39.09
Change+$0.36 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.51B
ANWPX vs FWAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. FWAFX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Hold and FWAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. FWAFX (3.51B). FWAFX (0.49) and ANWPX (0.48) have matching dividends . ANWPX was incepted earlier than FWAFX: ANWPX (53 years) vs FWAFX (17 years). FWAFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. ANWPX (24.00). ANWPX (6%) and FWAFX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ANWPX: FWAFX (0) vs ANWPX (250). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.82 vs. FWAFX (-1.08). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 35.42 vs. FWAFX (16.17).
| ANWPX | FWAFX | ANWPX / FWAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.98 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.98 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.095 | 13.644 | 140% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 3.51B | 4,639% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.49 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.82 | -1.08 | -1,189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.71 | 57.29 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.42 | 16.17 | 219% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.22 | 74.20 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement