Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs FCGIX
ANWPX vs FCGIX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs FCGIX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$71.21
Change+$0.05 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.35B
NYLI PineStone Global Equity
Price$20.73
Change+$0.06 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.73M
ANWPX vs FCGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. FCGIX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and FCGIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. FCGIX (41.7M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than FCGIX: ANWPX (0.51) vs FCGIX (0.41). ANWPX was incepted earlier than FCGIX: ANWPX (52 years) vs FCGIX (8 years). FCGIX (1.49) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). ANWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FCGIX (19.00). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGIX: ANWPX (250) vs FCGIX (1000000). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.07 vs. FCGIX (4.34). FCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 46.54 vs. ANWPX (42.99).
| ANWPX | FCGIX | ANWPX / FCGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.85 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.49 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.651 | 7.132 | 205% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 41.7M | 378,897% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.41 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.07 | 4.34 | 393% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.17 | 28.65 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.99 | 46.54 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.23 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement