Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs FCGIX
ANWPX vs FCGIX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs FCGIX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$71.35
Change-$0.39 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
NYLI PineStone Global Equity
Price$20.82
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.77M
ANWPX vs FCGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. FCGIX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Hold and FCGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. FCGIX (41.8M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than FCGIX: ANWPX (1.00) vs FCGIX (0.55). ANWPX was incepted earlier than FCGIX: ANWPX (53 years) vs FCGIX (9 years). FCGIX (1.49) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). FCGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. ANWPX (23.00). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGIX: ANWPX (250) vs FCGIX (1000000). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.01 vs. FCGIX (4.25). FCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 24.93 vs. ANWPX (16.94).
| ANWPX | FCGIX | ANWPX / FCGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.85 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.49 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.600 | 1.759 | 91% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 41.8M | 389,952% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 0.55 | 183% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.01 | 4.25 | 306% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.61 | 24.50 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.94 | 24.93 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.98 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement