Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs FCGIX
ANWPX vs FCGIX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs FCGIX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$73.97
Change+$0.14 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.86B
NYLI PineStone Global Equity
Price$22.21
Change+$0.08 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.14M
ANWPX vs FCGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. FCGIX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Hold and FCGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. FCGIX (43.1M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than FCGIX: ANWPX (0.48) vs FCGIX (0.39). ANWPX was incepted earlier than FCGIX: ANWPX (53 years) vs FCGIX (8 years). FCGIX (1.49) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). ANWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FCGIX (19.00). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGIX: ANWPX (250) vs FCGIX (1000000). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.82 vs. FCGIX (5.20). FCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 47.02 vs. ANWPX (35.42).
| ANWPX | FCGIX | ANWPX / FCGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.85 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.49 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.095 | 14.780 | 129% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 43.1M | 378,190% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.39 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.82 | 5.20 | 247% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.71 | 47.69 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.42 | 47.02 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.22 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement