Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs FCGEX
ANWPX vs FCGEX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs FCGEX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$71.68
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.96B
NYLI PineStone Global Equity
Price$20.62
Change+$0.03 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.98M
ANWPX vs FCGEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. FCGEX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a StrongBuy and FCGEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. FCGEX (42M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than FCGEX: ANWPX (0.50) vs FCGEX (0.20). ANWPX was incepted earlier than FCGEX: ANWPX (52 years) vs FCGEX (8 years). FCGEX (1.71) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). ANWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FCGEX (19.00). ANWPX (6%) and FCGEX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGEX: ANWPX (250) vs FCGEX (15000). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.69 vs. FCGEX (1.98). FCGEX return over 5 years is better than : 41.12 vs. ANWPX (38.60).
| ANWPX | FCGEX | ANWPX / FCGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.10 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.71 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.408 | 7.061 | 218% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 15000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159B | 42M | 378,571% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.20 | 248% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.69 | 1.98 | 690% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.68 | 18.59 | 187% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.60 | 41.12 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.12 | N/A | - |