Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs FCGEX
ANWPX vs FCGEX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs FCGEX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$67.50
Change-$0.81 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.58B
NYLI PineStone Global Equity
Price$19.76
Change-$0.30 (-1.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.72M
ANWPX vs FCGEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. FCGEX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and FCGEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 151B vs. FCGEX (44.7M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than FCGEX: ANWPX (0.53) vs FCGEX (0.21). ANWPX was incepted earlier than FCGEX: ANWPX (52 years) vs FCGEX (8 years). FCGEX (1.71) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). ANWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FCGEX (7.00). ANWPX (6%) and FCGEX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGEX: ANWPX (250) vs FCGEX (15000). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.94 vs. FCGEX (-1.29). FCGEX (50.31) and ANWPX (48.42) have equivalent 5 years return.
| ANWPX | FCGEX | ANWPX / FCGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.10 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.71 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.678 | 2.596 | 334% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 15000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 151B | 44.7M | 337,808% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.21 | 254% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.94 | -1.29 | -690% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.13 | 30.20 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.42 | 50.31 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.43 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement