ANSS
Price
$374.30
Change
-$18.42 (-4.69%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
30.22B
11 days until earnings call
QTWO
Price
$90.94
Change
-$0.50 (-0.55%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
3.1B
11 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ANSS vs QTWO

Header iconANSS vs QTWO Comparison
Open Charts ANSS vs QTWOBanner chart's image
ANSYS
Price$374.30
Change-$18.42 (-4.69%)
Volume$18.89M
Capitalization30.22B
Q2 Holdings
Price$90.94
Change-$0.50 (-0.55%)
Volume$331.44K
Capitalization3.1B
ANSS vs QTWO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ANSS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ANSS vs. QTWO commentary
Jul 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANSS is a Hold and QTWO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 20, 2025
Stock price -- (ANSS: $374.30 vs. QTWO: $90.94)
Brand notoriety: ANSS and QTWO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ANSS: 901% vs. QTWO: 69%
Market capitalization -- ANSS: $30.22B vs. QTWO: $3.1B
ANSS [@Packaged Software] is valued at $30.22B. QTWO’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ANSS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQTWO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ANSS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ANSS and QTWO are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ANSS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QTWO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ANSS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QTWO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QTWO is a better buy in the short-term than ANSS.

Price Growth

ANSS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.06% price change this week, while QTWO (@Packaged Software) price change was +1.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

ANSS is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

QTWO is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.38% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANSS($30.2B) has a higher market cap than QTWO($3.11B). ANSS YTD gains are higher at: 10.960 vs. QTWO (-9.647). ANSS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 772M vs. QTWO (15.6M). ANSS has more cash in the bank: 860M vs. QTWO (324M). QTWO has less debt than ANSS: QTWO (549M) vs ANSS (854M). ANSS has higher revenues than QTWO: ANSS (2.27B) vs QTWO (625M).
ANSSQTWOANSS / QTWO
Capitalization30.2B3.11B973%
EBITDA772M15.6M4,949%
Gain YTD10.960-9.647-114%
P/E Ratio60.61N/A-
Revenue2.27B625M363%
Total Cash860M324M265%
Total Debt854M549M156%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ANSS vs QTWO: Fundamental Ratings
ANSS
QTWO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2270
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6690
SMR RATING
1..100
6790
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2246
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
69100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QTWO's Valuation (55) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as ANSS (74) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to ANSS’s over the last 12 months.

ANSS's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as QTWO (90) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ANSS’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

ANSS's SMR Rating (67) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as QTWO (90) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ANSS’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

ANSS's Price Growth Rating (22) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as QTWO (46) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ANSS’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

ANSS's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as QTWO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ANSS’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ANSSQTWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
60%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ANSS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TPMN24.320.14
+0.59%
Timothy Plan Market Neutral ETF
VLUE113.97-0.02
-0.02%
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
EQIN45.10-0.08
-0.18%
Columbia US Equity Income ETF
UMMA26.54-0.11
-0.41%
Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF
NMCO10.16-0.05
-0.49%
Nuveen Municipal Credit Opportunities Fund

ANSS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ANSS has been closely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ANSS jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ANSS
1D Price
Change %
ANSS100%
N/A
SNPS - ANSS
84%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
CDNS - ANSS
77%
Closely correlated
-1.65%
PDFS - ANSS
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
QTWO - ANSS
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
S - ANSS
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.64%
More

QTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTWO
1D Price
Change %
QTWO100%
-0.55%
FRSH - QTWO
66%
Loosely correlated
+3.03%
ALKT - QTWO
65%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ADSK - QTWO
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.67%
WEAV - QTWO
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.78%
ANSS - QTWO
61%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More