ANPDY
Price
$293.54
Change
+$0.86 (+0.29%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
32.64B
BSFFF
Price
$27.93
Change
-$0.19 (-0.68%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.89B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ANPDY vs BSFFF

Header iconANPDY vs BSFFF Comparison
Open Charts ANPDY vs BSFFFBanner chart's image
Anta Sports Products
Price$293.54
Change+$0.86 (+0.29%)
Volume$858
Capitalization32.64B
Basic-Fit
Price$27.93
Change-$0.19 (-0.68%)
Volume$270
Capitalization1.89B
ANPDY vs BSFFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ANPDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BSFFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ANPDY vs. BSFFF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANPDY is a StrongBuy and BSFFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (ANPDY: $293.54 vs. BSFFF: $27.93)
Brand notoriety: ANPDY and BSFFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ANPDY: 150% vs. BSFFF: 103%
Market capitalization -- ANPDY: $32.64B vs. BSFFF: $1.89B
ANPDY [@Recreational Products] is valued at $32.64B. BSFFF’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $1.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $39.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $4.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ANPDY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBSFFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ANPDY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BSFFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ANPDY is a better buy in the long-term than BSFFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ANPDY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BSFFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ANPDY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BSFFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ANPDY and BSFFF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ANPDY (@Recreational Products) experienced а +3.37% price change this week, while BSFFF (@Recreational Products) price change was -0.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +4.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.51%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+4.21% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANPDY($32.6B) has a higher market cap than BSFFF($1.89B). BSFFF has higher P/E ratio than ANPDY: BSFFF (230.45) vs ANPDY (15.57). ANPDY (19.739) and BSFFF (19.615) have similar YTD gains .
ANPDYBSFFFANPDY / BSFFF
Capitalization32.6B1.89B1,727%
EBITDAN/A585M-
Gain YTD19.73919.615101%
P/E Ratio15.57230.457%
RevenueN/A1.31B-
Total CashN/A36.7M-
Total DebtN/A2.9B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ANPDY vs BSFFF: Fundamental Ratings
ANPDY
BSFFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2390
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8092
SMR RATING
1..100
2795
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4940
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6324
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ANPDY's Valuation (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BSFFF (95). This means that ANPDY’s stock grew significantly faster than BSFFF’s over the last 12 months.

ANPDY's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as BSFFF (92). This means that ANPDY’s stock grew similarly to BSFFF’s over the last 12 months.

ANPDY's SMR Rating (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BSFFF (95). This means that ANPDY’s stock grew significantly faster than BSFFF’s over the last 12 months.

BSFFF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as ANPDY (49). This means that BSFFF’s stock grew similarly to ANPDY’s over the last 12 months.

BSFFF's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ANPDY (63). This means that BSFFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ANPDY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ANPDYBSFFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
73%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ANPDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BSFFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GQRPX18.830.04
+0.21%
GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Inv
FLMIX10.04-0.02
-0.20%
Meeder Muirfield Institutional
PEQLX37.58-0.08
-0.21%
Putnam Large Cap Value R5
AFGGX19.75-0.05
-0.25%
Yorktown Growth A
IYSYX18.62-0.11
-0.59%
Macquarie Smid Cap Core Fund Class Y

ANPDY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ANPDY has been closely correlated with LNNGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ANPDY jumps, then LNNGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ANPDY
1D Price
Change %
ANPDY100%
+0.29%
LNNGY - ANPDY
74%
Closely correlated
+1.06%
NCBDF - ANPDY
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
ANPDF - ANPDY
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BSFFF - ANPDY
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
CLKXF - ANPDY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BSFFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BSFFF and ANPDY have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BSFFF and ANPDY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BSFFF
1D Price
Change %
BSFFF100%
-0.68%
ANPDY - BSFFF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
GYYMF - BSFFF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANPDF - BSFFF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CUKPF - BSFFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLKXF - BSFFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More