ANPDF
Price
$11.65
Change
-$0.08 (-0.68%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
33.17B
FOCIF
Price
$2.50
Change
-$0.60 (-19.35%)
Updated
May 7 closing price
Capitalization
433.79M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ANPDF vs FOCIF

Header iconANPDF vs FOCIF Comparison
Open Charts ANPDF vs FOCIFBanner chart's image
Anta Sports Products
Price$11.65
Change-$0.08 (-0.68%)
Volume$1.9K
Capitalization33.17B
Focusrite
Price$2.50
Change-$0.60 (-19.35%)
Volume$100
Capitalization433.79M
ANPDF vs FOCIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ANPDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FOCIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ANPDF vs. FOCIF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANPDF is a Hold and FOCIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (ANPDF: $11.65 vs. FOCIF: $2.50)
Brand notoriety: ANPDF and FOCIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ANPDF: 3% vs. FOCIF: 88%
Market capitalization -- ANPDF: $33.17B vs. FOCIF: $433.79M
ANPDF [@Recreational Products] is valued at $33.17B. FOCIF’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $433.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ANPDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFOCIF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ANPDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FOCIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ANPDF and FOCIF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ANPDF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FOCIF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ANPDF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FOCIF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FOCIF is a better buy in the short-term than ANPDF.

Price Growth

ANPDF (@Recreational Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FOCIF (@Recreational Products) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.58%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+4.20% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANPDF($33.2B) has a higher market cap than FOCIF($434M). ANPDF has higher P/E ratio than FOCIF: ANPDF (29.41) vs FOCIF (13.32). ANPDF YTD gains are higher at: 19.487 vs. FOCIF (-31.880). ANPDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11.5B vs. FOCIF (36.4M). ANPDF has more cash in the bank: 25.5B vs. FOCIF (13.5M). FOCIF has less debt than ANPDF: FOCIF (26.8M) vs ANPDF (19.2B). ANPDF has higher revenues than FOCIF: ANPDF (52.5B) vs FOCIF (177M).
ANPDFFOCIFANPDF / FOCIF
Capitalization33.2B434M7,650%
EBITDA11.5B36.4M31,593%
Gain YTD19.487-31.880-61%
P/E Ratio29.4113.32221%
Revenue52.5B177M29,661%
Total Cash25.5B13.5M188,889%
Total Debt19.2B26.8M71,642%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ANPDF vs FOCIF: Fundamental Ratings
ANPDF
FOCIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
81100
SMR RATING
1..100
3847
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5085
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
814
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FOCIF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is in the same range as ANPDF (38). This means that FOCIF’s stock grew similarly to ANPDF’s over the last 12 months.

ANPDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as FOCIF (100). This means that ANPDF’s stock grew similarly to FOCIF’s over the last 12 months.

ANPDF's SMR Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as FOCIF (47). This means that ANPDF’s stock grew similarly to FOCIF’s over the last 12 months.

ANPDF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOCIF (85). This means that ANPDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOCIF’s over the last 12 months.

FOCIF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ANPDF (81). This means that FOCIF’s stock grew significantly faster than ANPDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ANPDFFOCIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
11%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
12%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ANPDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FOCIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BAK3.410.06
+1.79%
Braskem SA
BRN1.150.02
+1.77%
Barnwell Industries
CRGX4.460.06
+1.36%
CARGO Therapeutics
PCG13.91-0.08
-0.57%
PG&E Corp
MATW25.44-0.17
-0.66%
Matthews International Corp

ANPDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ANPDF and NCBDF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ANPDF and NCBDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ANPDF
1D Price
Change %
ANPDF100%
N/A
NCBDF - ANPDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANPDY - ANPDF
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
DSHK - ANPDF
10%
Poorly correlated
+2.01%
BSFFF - ANPDF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KENS - ANPDF
3%
Poorly correlated
+152.94%
More

FOCIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FOCIF and ANPDY have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FOCIF and ANPDY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOCIF
1D Price
Change %
FOCIF100%
N/A
ANPDY - FOCIF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
CUKPF - FOCIF
1%
Poorly correlated
+6.71%
GYYMF - FOCIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANPDF - FOCIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KENS - FOCIF
0%
Poorly correlated
+152.94%
More